Jewish Problem, Politics

We Name Presidents

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion have been widely harangued by World Jewry as an “anti-Semitic forgery.” Yet when one reads the Protocols then observes what is actually happening it is easy to see that what was spelled out in the Protocols in the late 19th Century, has indeed come to fruition.

Below is the ADL’s take on the Protocols:

A Hoax of Hate: The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion


The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is a classic in paranoid, racist literature. Taken by the gullible as the confidential minutes of a Jewish conclave convened in the last years of the nineteenth century, it has been heralded by anti-Semites as proof that Jews are plotting to take over the world. Since its contrivance around the turn of the century by the Russian Okhrana, or Czarist secret police, “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” has taken root in bigoted, frightened minds around the world.

The booklet’s twenty-four sections spell out the alleged secret plans of Jewish leaders seeking to attain world domination. They represent the most notorious political forgery of modern times. Although thoroughly discredited, the document is still being used to stir up anti-Semitic hatred.

Origins of the Protocols

Serge Nilus, a little-known Czarist official in Moscow, edited several editions of the Protocols, each with a different account of how he discovered the document. In his 1911 edition Nilus claimed that his source had stolen the document from (a non-existent) Zionist headquarters in France. Other “editors” of the Protocols maintained that the document was read at the First Zionist Congress held in 1897 in Basel, Switzerland.

The Hoax Spreads

Impact of the Bolshevik Revolution

After the Russian Revolution in 1917, frustrated supporters of the ousted Czar rescued the document from obscurity in order to discredit the Bolsheviks. The emigre Czarists portrayed the Revolution as part of a Jewish plot to enslave the world, and pointed to the Protocols as the blueprint of that plan. The scheme of yoking the Protocols to the Bolshevik Revolution not only led to the allegation of a Judeo-Communist conspiracy, but promoted the forgery internationally. In later years, vicious Soviet anti-Semitic propaganda under Stalin and others echoed the conspiracy mythology of the Protocols.

International Publicity

In the 1920’s, two British correspondents, Robert Wilton of the London Times and Victor Marsden of the Morning Post, each of whom had lived in pre-Communist Russia, .promoted the idea of a Jewish conspiracy in Great Britain. Eighteen articles on the subject of a Jewish conspiracy as well as on the “Protocols” themselves were published in the Morning Post. Marsden translated the Protocols into English and in his introduction to the document asserted:

…the Jews are carrying it out with steadfast purpose, creating wars and revolutions…to destroy the white Gentile race, that the Jews may seize the power during the resulting chaos and rule with their claimed superior intelligence over the remaining races of the world, as kings over slaves.”

A Polish language edition of the Protocols appeared in 1920. The following year the Arabs of Palestine and Syria used the Protocols to stir up resentment against Jewish settlers in Palestine, suggesting that the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine would further advance the “international Jewish conspiracy.” This propaganda tactic persists in the contemporary Middle East; Arabic editions of the Protocols have been widely circulated by official Saudi sources, among others.

American Debut

The Protocols were publicized in America by Boris Brasol, a former Czarist prosecutor. Auto magnate Henry Ford was one of those who responded to Brasol’s conspiratorial fantasies. “The Dearborn Independent,” owned by Ford, published an American version of the Protocols between May and September of 1920 in a series called ‘The International Jew: the World’s Foremost Problem.” The articles were later republished in book form with half a million copies in circulation in the United States, and were translated into several foreign languages.

Excerpt from Protocol 10 of the Protocols of Zion:


11. In the near future we shall establish the responsibility of presidents.

12. By that time we shall be in a position to disregard forms in carrying through matters for which our impersonal puppet will be responsible. What do we care if the ranks of those striving for power should be thinned, if there should arise a deadlock from the impossibility of finding presidents, a deadlock which will finally disorganize the country?

13. In order that our scheme may produce this result we shall arrange elections in favour of such presidents as have in their past some dark, undiscovered stain, some “Panama” or other—then they will be trustworthy agents for the accomplishment of our plans out of fear of revelations and from the natural desire of everyone who has attained power, namely, the retention of the privileges, advantages and honour connected with the office of president. The chamber of deputies will provide cover for, will protect, will elect presidents, but we shall take from it the right to propose new, or make changes in existing laws, for this right will be given by us to the responsible president, a puppet in our hands. Naturally, the authority of the presidents will then become a target for every possible form of attack, but we shall provide him with a means of self-defence in the right of an appeal to the people, for the decision of the people over the heads of their representatives, that is to say, an appeal to that same blind slave of ours—the majority of the mob. Independently of this we shall invest the president with the right of declaring a state of war. We shall justify this last right on the ground that the president as chief of the whole army of the country must have it at his disposal, in case of need for the defence of the new republican constitution, the right to defend which will belong to him as the responsible representative of this constitution. (Iran? Grenada? Kuwait? Iraq? Panama? Somalia? Bosnia? Kosovo? Indonesia?)

14. It is easy to understand that in these conditions the key of the shrine will lie in our hands, and no one outside ourselves will any longer direct the force of legislation.

15. Besides this we shall, with the introduction of the new republican constitution, take from the Chamber the right of interpolation on government measures, on the pretext of preserving political secrecy, and, further, we shall by the new constitution reduce the number of representatives to a minimum, thereby proportionately reducing political passions and the passion for politics. If, however, they should, which is hardly to be expected, burst into flame, even in this minimum, we shall nullify them by a stirring appeal and a reference to the majority of the whole people . . . Upon the president will depend the appointment of presidents and vice-presidents of the Chamber and the Senate. Instead of constant sessions of Parliaments we shall reduce their sittings to a few months. Moreover, the president, as chief of the executive power, will have the right to summon and dissolve Parliament, and, in the latter case, to prolong the time for the appointment of a new parliamentary assembly. But in order that the consequences of all these acts which in substance are illegal, should not, prematurely for our plans, fall upon the responsibility established by us of the president, WE SHALL INSTIGATE MINISTERS AND OTHER OFFICIALS OF THE HIGHER ADMINISTRATION ABOUT THE PRESIDENT TO EVADE HIS DISPOSITIONS BY TAKING MEASURES OF THEIR OWN, for doing which they will be made the scapegoats in his place . . . This part we especially recommend to be given to be played by the Senate, the Council of State, or the Council of Ministers, but not to an individual official.

16. The president will, at our discretion, interpret the sense of such of the existing laws as admit of various interpretation; he will further annul them when we indicate to him the necessity to do so, besides this, he will have the right to propose temporary laws, and even new departures in the government constitutional working, the pretext both for the one and the other being the requirements for the supreme welfare of the State. (Presidential Decrees such as F.D.R. employed to debase the US dollar and steal the gold and to place the U.S. under a permanent State of Emergency and War against its own citizens?)

The Protocols state that World Jewry selects the President then they manage his decisions and policies. Have we ever seen anything that contradicts this? Hell NO! Certainly not the case of the current White House occupant, Donald J Trump. Check out the video below (the Jews surrounding Trump are named starting at 9:23)

List of Jews named in the video:

Michael Abboud (Sephardic Jew) – Communications Coordinator, Donald J. Trump for President

Paul Achleitner (Ashkenazi Jew) – Chairman, Supervisory Board, Deutsche Bank (Donald Trump’s largest lender)

Miriam Adelson (Ashkenazi Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President; Donor, Future 45 PAC; Finance Vice Chairman Trump Presidential Inaugural Committee

Sheldon Adelson (Ashkenazi Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President; Donor, Future 45 PAC; Finance Vice Chairman Trump Presidential Inaugural Committee

Paul Atkins (Ashkenazi Jew) – Member, President Trump’s Strategic and Policy Forum

Brian Bellard (Ashkenazi Jew) – Finance Vice Chairman Trump Presidential Inaugural Committee

Elliott Broidy (Ashkenazi Jew) – Vice Chairman, Trump Victory Committee; Finance Vice Chairman Trump Presidential Inaugural Committee

Safra Catz (Ashkenazi Jew) – Executive Committee Member, Trump Presidential Transition Team

Michael Cohen (Ashkenazi Jew) – Executive Vice President and Special Counsel, The Trump Organization

Gary Cohn (Ashkenazi Jew) – Director, United States Economic Counsel

Delos (Toby) Cosgrove (Ashkenazi Jew) – Member, President Trump’s Strategic and Policy Forum

Gil Dezer (Ashkenazi Jew) – President, Trump Dezer Development

Michael Dezer (Ashkenazi Jew) – Founder, Trump Dezer Development

Lewis Eisenberg (Ashkenazi Jew) – Chairman, Trump Victory Committee; Finance Co-Chairman, Trump Presidential Inaugural Committee

Boris Epshteyn (Ashkenazi Jew) – Senior Adviser, Donald J. Trump for President

Stephen Feinberg (Ashkenazi Jew) – Member, Trump Economic Advisory Council; Donor, Trump Victory Fund

Lawrence Fink (Ashkenazi Jew) – Member, President Trump’s Strategic and Policy Forum

Alan Fishman (Ashkenazi Jew) – Chairman, Ladder Capital (Donald Trump’s second largest lender)

David Friedman (Ashkenazi Jew) – Co-Chairman, Israel Advisory Committee for Donald Trump; United States Ambassador to Israel

Samuel Fox (Ashkenazi Jew) – Vice Chairman, Trump Victory Committee

Alan Garten (Ashkenazi Jew) – Executive Vice President and General Counsel, The Trump Organization

Bruce Gelb (Ashkenazi Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President

Michael Glassner (Ashkenazi Jew) – Deputy Campaign Manager and Former National Political Director, Donald J. Trump for President; Special Advisor for Operations Trump Presidential Transition Team

Lawrence Glick (Ashkenazi Jew) – Executive Vice President of Strategic Development, The Trump Organization

Jason Greenblatt (Ashkenazi Jew) – Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer, The Trump Organization; Co-Chairman, Israel Advisory Committee for Donald Trump; President Trump’s Special Representitive For International Negotiations

Vincent Harris (Ashkenazi Jew) – Former Digital Strategy Manager, Donald J. Trump for President

Thomas Hicks Sr. (Ashkenazi Jew) – Finance Vice Chairman Trump Presidential Inaugural Committee

Carl Icahn (Ashkenazi Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President; Special Advisor to the President for Regulatory Reform

Gail Icahn (Ashkenazi Jew) – Finance Vice Chairman Trump Presidential Inaugural Committee

Robert Iger (Ashkenazi Jew) – Member, President Trump’s Strategic and Policy Forum

Travis Kalanick (Ashkenazi Jew) – Member, President Trump’s Strategic and Policy Forum

Peter Kalikow (Ashkenazi Jew) – Donor, Trump Victory Fund

Daniel Kowalski (Ashkenazi Jew) – Deputy Policy Director, Donald J. Trump for President; Member, Trump Economic Advisory Council

Charles Kushner (Ashkenazi Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President; Donor Make America Great Again PAC

Jared Kushner (Ashkenazi Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President; Senior Advisor Donald J. Trump for President; Executive Committee Member, Trump Presidential Transition Team

Yael Kushner [née Ivanka Trump] (Orthodox Jewish convert) – Executive Vice President, The Trump Organization; Senior Advisor Donald J. Trump for President; Executive Committee Member, Trump Presidential Transition Team

Bennett LeBow (Ashkenazi Jew) – Donor, Trump Victory Fund

Richard Lesser (Ashkenazi Jew) – Member, President Trump’s Strategic and Policy Forum

Ronald Lieberman (Ashkenazi Jew) – Executive Vice President of Management and Development, The Trump Organization

Howard Lorber (Ashkenazi Jew) – Member, Trump Economic Advisory Council; Donor, Trump Victory Fund

David Malpass (Ashkenazi Jew) – Member, Trump Economic Advisory Council

Douglas Manchester (Ashkenazi Jew) – Donor, Make America Great Again PAC

Bernard Marcus (Ashkenazi Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President; Donor, Rebuilding America Now PAC; Donor, Make America Number One PAC

Rebekah Mercer (Ashkenazi Jew) – Donor, Make America Number One PAC; Executive Committee Member, Trump Presidential Transition Team

Robert Mercer (Ashkenazi Jew) – Donor, Make America Number One PAC

Amanda Miller (Ashkenazi Jew) – Vice President of Marketing, The Trump Organization

Eli Miller (Ashkenazi Jew) – Chief Operating Officer, Donald J. Trump for President

Jason Miller (Ashkenazi Jew) – Senior Communications Adviser, Donald J. Trump for President; Communications Director, Trump Presidential Transition Team

Stephen Miller (Ashkenazi Jew) – National Policy Director, Donald J. Trump for President; National Policy Director, Trump Presidential Transition Team; Senior Advisor to the President for Policy

Steven Mnuchin (Ashkenazi Jew) – Donor, Trump Victory Fund; Member, Trump Economic Advisory Council; National Finance Chairman, Donald J. Trump for President; Executive Committee Member, Trump Presidential Transition Team; Secretary, United States Department of Treasury

Elon Musk (Ashkenazi Jew) – Member, President Trump’s Strategic and Policy Forum

Samuel Nunberg (Ashkenazi Jew) – Former Policy Adviser, Donald J. Trump for President

David Orowitz (Ashkenazi Jew) – Senior Vice President of Acquisitions and Development, The Trump Organization

Geoffrey Palmer [né Weissinger] (Ashkenazi Jew) – Donor, Rebuilding America Now PAC

John Paulson (Ashkenazi Jew) – Donor, Trump Victory Fund; Member, Trump Economic Advisory Council

Laura Perlmutter (Ashkenazi Jew) – Donor, Trump Victory Fund; Finance Vice Chairman, Trump Presidential Inaugural Committee

Andrew Puzder (Ashkenazi Jew) – Secretary, United States Department of Labor (withdrew candidacy)

Stewart Rahr (Ashkenazi Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President

Richard Roberts (Ashkenazi Jew) – Vice Chairman, Israel Advisory Committee for Donald Trump

George Ross (Ashkenazi Jew) – Executive Vice President and Senior Counsel, The Trump Organization

Wilbur Ross (Ashkenazi Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President; Donor, Trump Victory Fund; Member, Trump Economic Advisory Council; Secretary, United States Department of Commerce

Steven Roth (Ashkenazi Jew) – Member, Trump Economic Advisory Council; Donor, Trump Victory Fund

Keith Schiller (Ashkenazi Jew) – Director of Security, The Trump Organization

Stephen Schwarzman (Ashkenazi Jew) – Chairman, President Trump’s Strategic and Policy Forum

Melvin Sembler (Ashkenazi Jew) – Vice Chairman, Trump Victory Committee

Yaakov Shaham (Ashkenazi Jew) – Endorser, Donald J Trump for President, Donor, Victory Fund

Marc Short (Ashkenazi Jew) – Senior Adviser to Vice President Elect; Trump Presidential Transition Team

Peter Thiel (Ashkenazi Jew) – Endorser, Donald J Trump for President; Donor, Trump Victory Fund; Donor Rebuilding America Now PAC; Donor, Make America Number One PAC; Executive Committee Member, Trump Presidential Transition Team

Lara Trump [née Yunaska] (Ashkenazi Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President

Vanessa Trump [née Haydon] (Ashkenazi Jew/North European) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President

Kevin Warsh (Ashkenazi Jew) – Member, President Trump Strategic and Policy Forum

Mark Weinberger (Ashkenazi Jew) – Member, President Trump Strategic and Policy Forum

Ronald Weiser (Ashkenazi Jew) – Vice Chairman, Trump Victory Committee

Andrew Weiss (Ashkenazi Jew) – Executive Vice President, The Trump Organization

Allen Weisselberg (Ashkenazi Jew) – Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, The Trump Organization

Lawrence Weitzner (Ashkenazi Jew) – Adviser, Donald J. Trump for President

Steven Witkoff (Ashkenazi Jew) – Donor, Trump Victory Fund

Stephen Wynn [né Weinberg] (Ashkenazi Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President; Financial Vice Chairman, Trump Presidential Inaugural Committee

Richard LeFrak (Ashkenazi Jew) – Donor, Trump Victory Fund

Daniel Yergin (Ashkenazi Jew) – Member, President Trump Strategic and Policy Forum

Are the Protocols a hoax of hate as the ADL proclaims or do they explain how the world really works? Indeed the greatest proof of the voracity of the Protocols is the gross observable evidence of the world around you: World Jewry endorsed and funded Trump from get go! The Protocols state that International Jews select and control Presidents and that is most certainly true.


Crazz Files Appearance 12/1/2016


You can download the show here

Adam and I discuss Trump’s election and it’s ramifications. Are White Americans finally starting to wake up? There are some signs of life. What’s going to happen when they figure out who was behind WWI, WWII, the JFK assassination and 9/11 etc? The Jews are going to have to answer for their crimes. It’s clear they are not compatible with White Christian society. IT’S TIME TO EXPEL THE PARASITE! Boot the Jews out of the US and make it 110! #deportthejews

9/11, JFK, Politics

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion


You can download the audio here from the above YouTube video.

You can read The Protocols here or here.


Anyone who has tried to make sense of the world we live in needs to read The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. While widely claimed to be a forgery, The Protocols have had remarkable staying power over the years. That is because as Henry Ford himself stated in 1921 “The only statement I have to make about the Protocols is that they fit into what has gone on in the world situation these sixteen years. They fit it now.”


Yes they fit in Henry Ford’s time and they fit now. While Zionist controlled outlets like Wikipedia claim that The Protocols are “an antisemitic hoax purporting to describe a Jewish plan for global domination.” Anyone with a clue can see that what was described in The Protocols has already come to pass. Jews dominate banking, media, Hollywood and government. Jews are certainly well on their way to global domination if they have not already achieved it.

Jewish supremacists such as Menachem Begin fit right in with The Protocols:


While The Protocols may not have been from an actual Jewish meeting, as Ford stated The Protocols are “too terribly real for fiction, too well-sustained for speculation, too deep in its knowledge of the secret springs of life for forgery.”

9/11, Politics

Dick Cheney: A Clear and Present Danger

If the American people ever find out what we have done, they will chase us down the streets and lynch us – George H.W. Bush.

I think there will be another attack,” Cheney said on Hugh Hewitt’s radio show. “And next time, I think it’s likely to be far deadlier than the last one. You can just imagine what would happen if somebody could smuggle a nuclear device, put it in a shipping container, and drive it down the Beltway outside of Washington, D.C.”


After Cheney made this pronouncement of a more deadly 9/11 by the end of the decade, Gordon Duff’s behind the scenes sources stated that it is already in the works. There is talk of 100,000 to 200,000 victims in the next false flag. And there won’t be any pretense that this attack was anything but nuclear. There has been reluctance on the part of the power structure to admit that 9/11 was a nuclear event. They have used kerosene, nanothermite and DEWs for fig leaves but there won’t be any of that nonsense next time around.

When Dick Cheney and his PNAC cronies predicted a “new Pearl Harbor” in September of 2000, it came to fruition 12 months later. Love him or hate him Dick Cheney is a serious man and not someone you can afford to take lightly. His track record of serving the Zionist Oligarchs is well established.


The Council on Foreign Relations

Between 1987 and 1989, during his last term in Congress, Cheney was a director of the Council on Foreign Relations foreign policy organization. What exactly is the CFR, what do they do and what are their goals?


The Council on Foreign Relations was founded by Elihu Root, who was the personal attorney for JP Morgan. Morgan was well known to be a Rothschild frontman. The publicly stated goal of the CFR was to “increase America’s understanding of the world.”

In the early 1960s Georgetown Professor Carroll Quigley was allowed to see the archives at the CFR. Quigley was writing a book favorable to the oligarchs who founded and ran the CFR.

Quigley revealed that the true goal of the CFR was “to create a world system of financial control, in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country, and the economy of the world as a whole controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences.”

The Bank of the United States (1816-36), an early attempt at an American central bank, was abolished by President Andrew Jackson, who believed that it threatened the nation. He wrote: “The bold effort the present bank had made to control the government, the distress it had wantonly produced…are but premonitions of the fate that awaits the American people should they be deluded into a perpetuation of this institution or the establishment of another like it.”

Thomas Jefferson wrote: “The Central Bank is an institution of the most deadly hostility existing against the principles and form of our Constitution…if the American people allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”

Does that not describe the situation in America today?

The U.S. managed to do without a central bank until early in this century, when, according to Congressman Charles Lindbergh, Sr., “The Money Trust caused the 1907 panic, and thereby forced Congress to create a National Monetary Commission.” Headed by Senator Nelson Aldrich, father-in-law of John D. Rockefeller, Jr., the Commission recommended creation of a central bank.

Though unconstitutional, as only “The Congress shall have Power…To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof…” (Article I, Section 8, U.S. Constitution) the Federal Reserve Act was passed in December 1913; ostensibly to stabilize the economy and prevent further panics, but as Lindberg warned Congress: “This act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth…the invisible government by the money power, proven to exist by the Money Trust investigation, will be legalized.” The Great Depression and numerous recessions later, it is obvious the Federal Reserve produces inflation and federal debt whenever it desires, but not stability.

Congressman Louis McFadden, House Committee on Banking and Currency Chairman (1920-31), stated: “When the Federal Reserve Act was passed, the people of these United States did not perceive that a world banking system was being set up here. A super-state controlled by international bankers and industrialists…acting together to enslave the world…Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers but the truth is–the Fed has usurped the government.”

Although called “Federal,” the Federal Reserve System is privately owned by member banks, makes its own policies, and is not subject to oversight by Congress or the President. As the overseer and supplier of reserves, the Fed gave banks access to public funds, which enhanced their lending capacity.

Peter Kershaw, in “Economic Solutions” lists the ten major shareholders of the Federal Reserve Bank System as: Rothschild: London and Berlin; Lazard Bros: Paris; Israel Seiff: Italy; Kuhn- Loeb Company: Germany; Warburg: Hamburg and Amsterdam; Lehman Bros: New York; Goldman and Sachs: New York; Rockefeller: New York. (That most, if not all of these families just happen to be Jewish, you may judge the significance of yourself). The balance of stock is owned by major commercial member banks.

Dick Cheney has served the interests of the Zionist Oligarchs for decades. He had earned their trust enough to be a founding member of PNAC and Vice President in the Bush administration.


The Project for a New American Century


The Project for the New American Century, or PNAC, is a Washington-based think tank created in 1997. Above all else, PNAC desires and demands one thing: The establishment of a global American empire to bend the will of all nations. They chafe at the idea that the United States, the last remaining superpower, does not do more by way of economic and military force to bring the rest of the world under the umbrella of a new socio-economic Pax Americana.

The fundamental essence of PNAC’s ideology can be found in a White Paper produced in September of 2000 entitled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century.” In it, PNAC outlines what is required of America to create the global empire they envision. According to PNAC, America must:

* Reposition permanently based forces to Southern Europe, Southeast Asia and the Middle East;
* Modernize U.S. forces, including enhancing our fighter aircraft, submarine and surface fleet capabilities;
* Develop and deploy a global missile defense system, and develop a strategic dominance of space;
* Control the “International Commons” of cyberspace;
* Increase defense spending to a minimum of 3.8 percent of gross domestic product, up from the 3 percent currently spent.

Most ominously, this PNAC document described four “Core Missions” for the American military. The two central requirements are for American forces to “fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars,” and to “perform the ‘constabulary’ duties associated with shaping the security environment in critical regions.” Note well that PNAC does not want America to be prepared to fight simultaneous major wars. That is old school. In order to bring this plan to fruition, the military must fight these wars one way or the other to establish American dominance for all to see.

Why is this important? After all, wacky think tanks are a cottage industry in Washington, DC. They are a dime a dozen. In what way does PNAC stand above the other groups that would set American foreign policy if they could? Two events brought PNAC into the mainstream of American government: the disputed election of George W. Bush, and the attacks of September 11th. When Bush assumed the Presidency, the men who created and nurtured the imperial dreams of PNAC became the men who run the Pentagon, the Defense Department and the White House. When the Towers came down, these men saw, at long last, their chance to turn their White Papers into substantive policy.

Vice President Dick Cheney is a founding member of PNAC, along with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Defense Policy Board chairman Richard Perle. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz is the ideological father of the group. Bruce Jackson, a PNAC director, served as a Pentagon official for Ronald Reagan before leaving government service to take a leading position with the weapons manufacturer Lockheed Martin.


PNAC Calls For a New Pearl Harbor

new pearl harbor

Dov Zakheim is an ordained rabbi and reportedly holds Israeli citizenship. Zakheim attended Jew’s College in London and became an ordained Orthodox Jewish Rabbi in 1973. He was adjunct professor at New York’s Jewish Yeshiva University. Zakheim is close to the Israeli lobby.

Dov Zakheim is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and in 2000 a co-author of the Project for the New American Century’s position paper, Rebuilding America’s Defenses, advocating the necessity for a Pearl-Harbor-like incident to mobilize the country into war with its enemies, mostly Middle Eastern Muslim nations.


He was appointed by Bush as Pentagon Comptroller from May 4, 2001 to March 10, 2004. At that time he was unable to explain the disappearance of $1 trillion dollars. Actually, nearly three years earlier, Donald Rumsfeld announced on September 10, 2001 that an audit discovered $2.3 trillion was also missing from the Pentagon books. That story, as mentioned, was buried under 9-11’s rubble. The two sums disappeared on Zakheim’s watch. We can only guess where that cash went.

(Hint: Israel would be a good guess)


Five Deferment Dick: The Epitome of a Chickenhawk


Of course the next false flag will be used to once again goad the American public into supporting wars against Israel’s enemies. Mr. Cheney has no qualms about sending your sons and daughters off to die for Israel but he did everything he could to avoid serving in Vietnam. Dick Cheney is a prime example of a chickenhawk.

The Urban dictionary defines a chickenhawk as “Any person who, in an official capacity, sends other people out routinely for dangerous activities while himself having never been exposed to the same risky behavior. This usually occurs in an authoritarian, militarized system and comes with constant propaganda in which the leader fashions himself as an ultimately benevolent crusader.

During the 2004 Presidential Campaign Cheney’s five Vietnam Era draft deferments became an issue. Even the New York Times could see the hypocrisy in a war monger like Cheney doing everything he could to avoid serving in Vietnam:

While Mr. Cheney’s deferment history was briefly an issue when George W. Bush picked him as his running mate in 2000, the Democrats did not focus on it after Al Gore, the Democratic presidential nominee, who had served in Vietnam, picked as his running mate Senator Joseph Lieberman, who also had not served.

The issue also received little attention during Mr. Cheney’s Senate confirmation hearings as defense secretary in 1989 under the first President Bush, largely because the Armed Services Committee had just completed a bitter and protracted battle over the president’s original choice, John G. Tower. Mr. Tower had faced questions about philandering, drinking and conflicts over defense contracts before he was rejected.

Senators of both parties were so eager to confirm Mr. Cheney quickly that they were relatively undemanding, not pressing him on the draft but merely asking him if he had anything to say about it.

He said he “never served” because of deferments to finish a college career that lasted six years rather than four, which he attributed to subpar academic performance and the fact that he had to work to pay for his education.

He added that he “would have obviously been happy to serve had I been called.”

Away from the hearing room, he told the Washington Post that he had sought his deferments because “I had other priorities in the 60’s than military service.”

“I don’t regret the decisions I made,” he added. “I complied fully with all the requirements of the statutes, registered with the draft when I turned 18. Had I been drafted, I would have been happy to serve.”

But others contend that Mr. Cheney appeared to go to some length to avoid the draft.

“Five deferments seems incredible to me,” said David Curry, a professor at the University of Missouri in St. Louis who has written extensively about the draft, including a 1985 book, “Sunshine Patriots: Punishment and the Vietnam Offender.”

“That’s a lot of times for the draft board to say O.K.,” Mr. Curry said.

In the Bunker With Norman Mineta on 9/11


There can be no doubt Dick Cheney was a central figure in the events of 9/11. Norm Mineta’s testimony portraits Cheney as having been the man who issuing the orders on 9/11, not President Bush:

Former Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta answered questions from members of 9/11 Truth about his testimony before the 9/11 Commission report.

Mineta says Vice President Cheney was “absolutely” already there when he arrived at approximately 9:25 a.m. in the PEOC (Presidential Emergency Operations Center) bunker on the morning of 9/11. Mineta seemed shocked to learn the 9/11 Commission Report claimed Cheney had not arrived there until 9:58– after the Pentagon had been hit, a report that Mineta definitively contradicted.

Norman Mineta revealed that Lynn Cheney was also in the PEOC bunker already at the time of his arrival, along with a number of other staff.

Mineta is on video testifying before the 9/11 Commission, though it was omitted from their final report. He told Lee Hamilton:

“During the time that the airplane was coming into the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President…the plane is 50 miles out…the plane is 30 miles out…and when it got down to the plane is 10 miles out, the young man also said to the vice president “do the orders still stand?” And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said “Of course the orders still stand, have you heard anything to the contrary!?”

While Cheney was barking out orders in the bunker, Bush was zig-zagging across the country:

Shortly after takeoff, Cheney apparently informed Bush of “a credible threat” to Air Force One. US Representative Adam Putnam “had barely settled into his seat on Air Force One … when he got the news that terrorists apparently had set their sights on the plane.” The Secret Service had received an anonymous call: “Air Force One is next.” The caller allegedly knew the agency’s code words relating to Air Force One procedures. Pilot Colonel Mark Tillman was told of the threat and he asked that an armed guard be stationed at the cockpit door. The Associated Press reported that the threat came “within the same hour” as the Pentagon crash (i.e., before 10:00 a.m., roughly when the plane took off). Details suggest this threat was not the same as the earlier one, but it’s hard to know for sure.

In his comments at Booker, Bush said he was immediately flying back to Washington, but soon after takeoff, he, Cheney and the Secret Service began arguing whether it was safe to fly back to the capital. Andrew Card told Bush, “We’ve got to let the dust settle before we go back.” The plane apparently stayed over Sarasota until the argument was settled. Accounts differ, but until about 10:35 a.m. Air Force One “appeared to be going nowhere. The journalists on board – all of whom were barred from communicating with their offices – sensed that the plane was flying in big, slow circles.


Cheney apparently called Bush again at 10:32 a.m., and told him of another threat to Air Force One. Within minutes, the argument was over, and the plane turned away from Washington and flew to Louisiana instead. Bush recalled: “I wanted to come back to Washington, but the circumstances were such that it was just impossible for the Secret Service or the national security team to clear the way for Air Force One to come back.” Given that the rocket-like takeoff was due to a threat, this must have been another threat, possibly even a third threat.

The threat or threats to Air Force One were announced on September 12, after mounting criticism that Bush was out of sight in Louisiana and Nebraska during most of the day and did not return to Washington until 10 hours after the attacks. White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said there was “real and credible information that the White House and Air Force One were targets.”

The perps sent Bush to an elementary school in Florida so that he would be out of the way when the events of 9/11 commenced. When he tried to go back to Washington to play president he was thwarted by Cheney who appeared to be in charge down in the bunker. Clearly the perps saw Bush as a hindrance. Cheney appears to be much higher in the real power structure than does the hapless W. This is why Cheney must be taken much seriously than Bush.

Cheney Determined to Strike in US

Cheney Strike

When one of the key players in 9/11 predicts a far more deadly 9/11, you better pay attention. In his recent speech at the Republican Jewish Coalition Cheney stated that “the United States’ position in [the Middle East] is worse than at any time in my lifetime.” He added, “It’s reached the point where Israel and Egypt, [the United Arab] Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Jordan are closer to one another—imagine that!—than any of them is to us…Nobody who’s been our friend in the past any longer has any sense of trust in we’ll keep our commitments, that we’ll be there in a crisis when they need us. On the other hand, none of our adversaries need fear us.” Noting that the chief responsibility of a president is to protect the United States against “all enemies, foreign and domestic,” Cheney claimed that today that charge “is not being pursued in any kind of coherent manner.

Cheney has dismissed diplomacy and appears to endorse an Israeli strike against Iran’s nuclear program: “he recalled a dinner meeting he had in 2007 with Israeli General Amos Yadlin. Yadlin had flown in the Israeli Defense Force’s mission in 1981 that destroyed Iraq’s Osirak nuclear reactor, and he was the country’s military intelligence chief in 2007 when the Israel Defense Forces obliterated Syria’s nuclear reactor in the Deir ez-Zor region. Recalling his conversation with Yadlin, Cheney said, “He looked across the table over dinner, and he said, ‘Two down, one to go.’ I knew exactly what he meant.”

“One to go” was an obvious reference to bombing Iran’s nuclear program.

Given the evidence laid out in this article and previous articles, it’s not difficult to envision a scenario where the Zionists and Neocons once again nuke an American city, blame it on Iran and use the false flag attack as a pretext to yet again get US troops involved in the Middle East fighting yet another war for Israel. This time the stakes will be raised considerably.

Most observers believe that an attack on Iran would result in conflicts with Russia and China and perhaps even Korea. It goes without saying how disastrous a thermonuclear exchange with Russia would be. Most if not all US ships in the Gulf would probably be sunk and Iran would most likely close the Strait of Hormuz. Closing the Strait of Hormuz would be a disaster for the public as “the price of oil would start to soar and could rise 50 percent or more within days.”


However, some (Jewish) Traders on Wall Street WANT a WAR and BLOCKADE of Strait of Hormuz, as “only means to save the U.S. dollar” – from the American public realizing that they have been DEFRAUDED by Ben Bernanke’s “JUDENFETZEN” DEBASING of the U.S. dollar, at Bernanke’s wholly, privately owned (so-called) ‘Federal’ Reserve bank. If oil is cut off, the price of crude oil might go to $200, $300, $500, no one really knows… that would be THE ONLY way to SAVE THE DOLLAR, in extremis.

By creating a huge artificial demand for dollars, to soak up the dollar overhang, to PREVENT the FLIGHT FROM THE DOLLAR.

The threat from the BRICS countries must be dealt with by the Zionists. Sky high oil prices may be their way of propping up their Federal Reserve debt note knows as the US dollar.


As we can see the motivations for a “new deadlier 9/11” are there amongst the psychotic Zionist Oligarchs. Does this mean we are destined to lose thousands of more lives in a domestic false flag nuclear attack and plunge into more disastrous wars for Israel?

Clearly the elites have no qualms about sacrificing the lives of thousands of Americans if it can help get their agenda through. Moral considerations have no bearing for these people. The only thing that slows them down is the fear they won’t get away with it. In a just world Cheney and his Neocon/Zionist co-conspirators would all stand trial for war crimes.

They got away with 9/11. None of the perps were ever prosecuted for that false flag. Has the public gotten any wiser to the ways of the elites in the last 13 years? If we haven’t the price for our national ignorance this time is going to be far higher than it was in 2001.


The GOP/Jewish Coalition: Presidential Hopefuls Pander to Zionist Billionaire Sheldon Adelson

I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan. – Revelation 2:9 Adelson As the Obama Administration’s days in office start to wane, the process of vetting 2016 Republican presidential hopefuls is in full swing. Adelson has let it be known that he is looking for a Republican to back in the 2016 Presidential election. Right on queue Scott Walker, John Kasich, Chris Christie and Jeb Bush took turns pandering to the 80 year old hard core Zionist billionaire. Adelson and his wife spent more than $93 million on the 2012 elections so sucking up to Shelly is certainly worth the effort for a 2016 Republican presidential wannabe.

Business WeekWhat does Adelson hope to accomplish with his primary?

1. He wants to back an electable, mainstream Republican candidate. This is an implicit acknowledgement that he erred in backing a fringe figure in Gingrich last time around. Gingrich was the one who first launched the devastating “vulture capitalist” attacks on Romney (although the phrase is Rick Perry’s) that Obama later picked up. So this time, instead of personal loyalty, Adelson is focusing on electability. As notable as Adelson’s Vegas roster this weekend is the list of marquee names who are not there: Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, Rick Perry, Rick Santorum, and Mike Huckabee.

2. He really wants to stop Internet gambling. Adelson considers it a threat to his casino business. South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham introduced legislation this week—drafted with Adelson’s lobbyist, according to the New York Times—that would shut down Internet gambling. Adelson also funds a Washington pressure group, the Coalition to Stop Internet Gambling, that has focused on enlisting the support of social conservatives. As Graham told to the Times, explaining why he had become the senate sherpa for Adelson’s interests: “I would say that Sheldon has aligned himself with most Baptists in South Carolina.”

Here is Adelson’s presidential dilemma: The Venn diagram of “Republicans who oppose online gambling” doesn’t much overlap with “Republicans who are electable.” The first group comprises mainly social conservatives, such as Rick Santorum, Mike Huckabee, and possibly Rick Perry, who would oppose gambling on moral grounds. None are remotely top-tier candidates who would widen the Republican Party’s electoral appeal. The candidates who conceivably could do that—Christie, Bush, Marco Rubio, Rand Paul—tend to be positioning themselves as forward-thinking, innovation-minded, tech-friendly Republicans who can appeal to a more modern and moderate segment of the electorate than the old GOP. In the past two weeks, Rubio has given speeches at Uber and Google (GOOG) in Washington, D.C. Christie has already legalized Internet gambling in New Jersey. An outright ban seems an unlikely position for them to suddenly adopt, even if a lot of money is on the line. Sheldon Primary

Pat Buchanan’s Observations

These two goals don’t seem too ominous – everyone wants to back a winner and what oligarch doesn’t want to protect his business interests? But does Adelson actually have a far more sinister goal? From Pat Buchanan’s blog:

But last fall at Yeshiva University, this “very rational guy” (Adelson) gave this response to a question from Rabbi Shmuley Boteach on whether he supports U.S. negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program:

“No. What do you mean support negotiations? What are we going to negotiate about? What I would say is, ‘Listen, you see that desert out there, I want to show you something.’ …

You pick up your cell phone and you call somewhere in Nebraska and you say, ‘OK let it go.’

“So, there’s an atomic weapon, goes over ballistic missiles, the middle of the desert, that doesn’t hurt a soul. Maybe a couple of rattlesnakes, and scorpions, or whatever.

“And then you say, ‘See! The next one is in the middle of Tehran. So, we mean business. You want to be wiped out? Go ahead and take a tough position and continue with your nuclear development.

“‘You want to be peaceful. Just reverse it all, and we will guarantee that you can have a nuclear power plant for electricity purposes, energy purposes.’”

Adelson’s response was recorded by Philip Weiss of Mondoweiss website who was at Yeshiva and filmed the interview. Weiss says the audience cheered Adelson’s proposed nuclear strike on Iran and no one on the stage, not Wall Street Journal columnist Bret Stephens, peeped a word of dissent.

And this is a “very rational guy,” who doesn’t want “a crazy extremist to be the nominee”?

This is someone Republican presidential candidates must appease, if they don’t want tens of millions in attack ads run against them?

This is someone the Republican presidential hopefuls must hearken to now?

Again, so it would seem.

Chris Christie Makes His Pitch

Christie JerusalemGov. Chris Christie’s Speech at the Republican Jewish Coalition

During his talk before the few dozen members of the RJC, Gov. Chris Christie recounted his recent trip to Israel: “I took a helicopter ride from the occupied territories” and came “to understand the military risk that Israel faces every day.”

Christie’s effort at bonding boomeranged. An angry Morton Klein of the Zionist Organization of America confronted Christie to demand that he explain just what he meant by “occupied territories.”

For half a century, the United States has considered the West Bank occupied land where Israeli settlements are illegal under the Fourth Geneva Convention.

Whatever Christie’s response, it did not satisfy the ZOA or Klein who declared: “Either [Christie] doesn’t understand the issue, or he’s hostile to Israel.

Whereupon Christie, in a private audience with Adelson, apologized.

A source close to Adelson told Politico that Christie made clear “that he misspoke when he referred to the ‘occupied territories.’ And he conveyed that he is an unwavering friend and committed supporter of Israel, and was sorry for any confusion that came across as a result of the misstatement.”

The governor is a tough guy, but this sounds like groveling.

Is this what Republican presidential candidates must do now?

Kowtow to this fattest of fat cats who wants to buy himself an American war on Iran?

Typically the unseemly process of politicians selling themselves off to the highest bidder goes on behind closed doors but at the Republican Jewish Coalition aka The Sheldon Primary, the proceedings were on full public display.

Scott Walker: Battle Tested Zionist Shill

Scott Walker, the Wisconsin governor, pandered unabashedly by giving the Hebrew meaning of his son Matthew’s name and by mentioning that he displays a menorah at home along with the Christmas tree.

Walker RJC

Walker is no stranger to sucking up to Zionist billionaires – he has made a career out of toeing the Koch brother’s line in Madison and doing everything he can to crush what’s left of the labor movement.

Walker is an extremely divisive figure and he even had to face a recall election that he somehow managed to win. A large percentage of the Wisconsin populace hates Walker with a passion. It is difficult to see him winning a national election.


John Kasich: From Moderate Republican to Zionist Sycophant

John Kasich can hardly be described as a hard core conservative. During his congressional career from 1983 to January of 2001 he supported the assault weapons ban, cut spending on the B-2 bomber and worked to close some corporate tax loopholes. As chairman of the House Budget Committee he was credited with balancing the Federal Budget.

Fast forward to the Sheldon Primary and Kasich is reduced to pandering to the Zionists:

Kasich, the Ohio governor, kept addressing his speech to “Sheldon,” as if he were having a private tete-a-tete with the mega-donor (Adelson and his wife spent more than $93 million on the 2012 elections) and not speaking to a roomful of people.

No doubt a veteran politico like Kasich is acutely aware of the need to stay on the good side of the Zionists. If they start running attack ads that will spell the end of any realistic chance he has at the White House.

Jeb Bush: The Prize Bull

Ari Fleischer, press secretary to Bush 43, and a member of Adelson’s RJC fiefdom, put it plain and simple: “The ‘Sheldon Primary’ is an important primary. … anybody running for the Republican nomination would want to have Sheldon at his side.”


One such man is Jeb Bush, son and brother to presidents, who was the prize bull at Sheldon’s cattle show. Daniel Ruth of the Tampa Bay Times speculates on Jeb’s motive in showing up:

“Would you slink into Las Vegas to schmooze gambling mogul Sheldon Adelson who regards GOP presidential nominees as if they were trophy heads mounted in his den, if you had no interest in the White House? Bush is not going to Vegas to catch Meat Loaf’s act at Planet Hollywood.”

The 2016 presidential hopefuls “are falling at his feet,” said a veteran Republican strategist of the 80-year-old oligarch. Each of those who came — Bush, Chris Christie, and Govs. Scott Walker and John Kasich — apparently auditioned, one by one, before the godfather.

The Bush family has a long track record of serving the Zionists. Bush is also polling at around 12.3% at the time of this writing so he is not far behind early leaders Rand Paul and Mike Huckabee.

Rand Paul: Elephant in the Room

At the Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) meeting in Las Vegas this weekend, Paul was nowhere to be found, but his presence was felt in the form of a straw man — and frequent worry. Speaker after speaker, from former Florida governor Jeb Bush to New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, laid into Paul’s more isolationist views on foreign policy. They never mentioned the lawmaker by name, but the message came across loud and clear.

The conference brings together some of the biggest names — and wallets — in Republican politics, most notably billionaire casino magnate Sheldon Adelson. At a private dinner for VIP donors in an Adelson-owned aircraft hangar holding one of his pair of Boeing 747s, Bush was asked about the growing isolationist wing of the Republican Party and replied there was no such thing — effectively casting Paul out of the fold, according to attendees.


Rand Paul has previously spoken of the need to end all foreign aid – even to Israel and the need to end all of the foreign entanglements that have cost the US taxpayers trillions of dollars and thousands of Americans their lives and limbs. These positions have caused a great deal of consternation amongst the Israel First crowd. After Rand’s trip to Israel he is backing off of his stance of cutting off Israel’s foreign aid. However there is still a great deal of distrust between the Zionists and Rand.

Darth Cheney: Endless Wars for Israel

Without naming names, Cheney also slammed the less hawkish members of his own party—such as Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.)—for believing that the United States “can afford to turn its back on that part of the world,” referring to the Middle East. “One of the things that concerns me first about the campaign, that I’m worried about,” he said, “is what I sense to be an increasing strain of isolationism, if I can put it in those terms, in our own party. It’s not taking over, by any means, but there is without question a body of thought now that’s supported by many Republicans and some candidates that the United States can afford to turn its back on that part of the world.” Cheney complained that “some candidates” think that the Middle East is “not our problem … Bring the boys home. There’s no reason in the world for us to be involved in that part of the world.” But, he remarked, “anybody who thinks back on the problems of 9/11″ knows “it makes absolutely no sense at all for us to contemplate that course of action.”


Cheney was a central figure in the events of 9/11. Cheney had no problem faking hijackings or nuking skyscrapers in New York to justify invading Iraq and Afghanistan. Over a million innocent people were killed in Iraq so that Israel can maintain its hegemony over the Middle East. Cheney and the Neocons are willing do almost anything so that Israel can maintain its dominance.

Looking at 2016 through the 9/11 lens

You cannot understand current events if you don’t understand what really happened on 9/11. Those who have studied 9/11 have concluded that it was a Zionist operation – the evidence is overwhelming. The Iraq and Afghanistan wars that followed primarily benefited Israel.

When we refer to Israel in the context of researching these types of events we actually mean the Rothschild criminal network which is the power structure that carved Israel out of Palestine. The Rothschilds control the major central banks of the world such as the European Central Bank, the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England etc. The Rothschilds have been in control of the world for a long time.

The Rothschild criminal cartel was behind the assassinations of Lincoln, FDR, JFK, RFK, World War I and II, Vietnam, the events of 9/11 and on and on. No informed person underestimates the power that Israel has to influence world events. If you are unfamiliar with the Rothschilds a good place to start your research is Daryl Bradford Smith’s Rothschilds Timeline.

911 fake real


If Israel has the power to assassinate US presidents – and they certainly appear to, they also have the power to influence elections. Adelson is making no secret of his desire to influence the 2016 Presidential Election. Is he spending all of this money merely to stop internet gambling or is he trying to get a stooge into the White House to start a war with Iran? Bamboozling the American public into yet another illegitimate war for Israel certainly fits the modus operandi of the Zionists.

It’s rather disgusting seeing Presidential contenders groveling to the Zionists. Almost as though we live in an alternate universe. Why must Americans grovel to the Zionists? Israel can’t survive without massive economic and military aid from the US. The US has provided Israel with $121 billion in economic assistance since World War II and fought countless wars to keep their despotic regime in power.

In a just world Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Giuliani, Zakheim, Silverstein and the rest of the 9/11 perpetrators would stand trial for war crimes. All of the foreign aid that the US has sent to Israel would be clawed back and our troops withdrawn from the region immediately.

But since the average American lives in a fog of Zionist propaganda we’ll most likely see yet another President elected in 2016 who will be beholden to the Zionists. A disastrous war with Iran may be the price of our national ignorance this time.

9/11, Politics

Have Ron and Rand Paul Been Oversold to the 9/11 Truth Community?

Ron Paul and his son Rand have gained popularity in recent years especially among working class people and members of the 9/11 Truth Community. Their non-interventionist foreign policy and rhetoric denouncing the TSA, NSA and the Federal Reserve while promoting civil liberties has served to gain them support among groups such as liberal working class people that wouldn’t normally support conservative Republicans. Alex Jones’ cheer leading has also put them on the map with groups that would normally reject their conservative economic agenda. A closer look at what is really going on with Ron and Rand Paul reveals that certainly in the 9/11 context there isn’t much “there” there. Ron and Rand appear to be the political equivalent of jet fuel, nanothermite and DEWs.

Ron and Rand Waffle on 9/11 Truth

9/11 was the most important historical event since the JFK assassination. It was the largest false flag terror event of all time. If you publicly tout the government’s Official Conspiracy Theory of 9/11 you are either “too stupid to live or crooked as hell” as Gordon Duff points out. The Pauls tip toe around 9/11 Truth without ever coming out publicly in support of The Movement. Ron Paul attributes the cover up of the events of 9/11 to government ineptness (a favorite conservative meme) rather than being an “inside job.” Ron Paul Oct. 7 2007: “I think indirectly out of ineptness rather than participating in it, planning it or allowing it to happen. I see its ineptness – that’s why I think the investigations are always (to) cover up of the inefficiency of government…..” The public quotes I have seen attributed to Rand pretty much echo his father’s sentiments.

Government ineptness cannot begin to explain how two 110 story, 500,000 ton buildings disappeared from the Manhattan skyline in less than 30 seconds. Or how a third 47 story skyscraper “collapsed” at free fall speed in a vacuum even though no plane hit it more than six hours after the Twin Towers “collapsed.” 9/11 was a well planned and executed event. It was not perfectly executed – they made some mistakes – but it certainly appears that the perpetrators achieved all of their major objectives from the operation. Of course none of the actual perps have been charged with any crime in relation to 9/11.

There are many quotes from Ron stating that a new investigation into 9/11 would be a good idea depending on how it was conducted. Ron has a valid point here – most government “investigations” merely cover up false flag events rather than expose them (see the Warren Commission, the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) and the 9/11 Commission). So calling for a new government investigation into 9/11 is rather pointless anyway.

No one should accuse either Ron or Rand as being “too stupid to live” – they are both highly educated, intelligent men. So that leaves us with “crooked as hell.” As we have seen during Ron’s lengthy term in the House and Rand’s stint in the Senate the perpetrators of 9/11 have had very little to fear from either Ron or Rand – no muckraking from either of them.

 Austrian Economics is a Disaster

No analysis of Ron Paul would be complete without a breakdown of his libertarian economic agenda. The Paul economic agenda is killer austerity budget cuts to programs that benefit low income people while nominally reducing corporate welfare programs like the defense budget. The bottom line is what is the difference if austerity is imposed by one of the too big to fail Zombie Banks or Ron or Rand Paul?

The Austrian School of economics policies would result in a deflationary crash – the more severe the better – aka “creative destruction.” This approach was inspired by Andrew Mellon. The thought being liquidate everything then there will be a recovery. The net result of these policies is that the moneyed interest will be able to buy up assets cheap. Austrians simply can’t fight economic depressions. There can be no government jobs program; it’s not allowable in the Austrian universe. There are no historical examples of this approach working.

Ron Paul’s 2012 Restore America budget would have cut one trillion dollars from the Federal Budget. This would average out to be a 27% across the board cut. However, the Pentagon budget cut would only be 15%. WIC would be slashed 33%, SCHIP (child health insurance) 44% Medicaid cut 35% and even though 50 million Americans are on food stamps Paul would cut that program massively.

Paul would keep the Bush tax cuts in place but squash all unions making every state a “Right to Work” state. This would end organized labor and lower wages for nearly all working people. Paul’s budget would encourage financial speculators and cut the corporate income tax to 15%. He also proposed to eliminate taxes on foreign profits. Of course no tax cuts for regular people are to be found anywhere in his budget.

Paul would eliminate five Federal cabinets: HUD, Departments of Energy, Commerce, Interior and Education as well as ALL foreign aid. While there is undoubtedly some largesse in foreign aid this would eliminate 57% of all food aid worldwide.

Ron Paul would seek to usher in another wave of deregulation and privatization. As though deregulating the banking industry was such a success under Reagan, Bush and Clinton. Banking and financial industry deregulation is what brought us the 2007-8 financial crisis. It wasn’t the sub-prime mortgages folks.

Ron Paul is not totally without merit. He opposed the 2008 Bush/Paulson bailout, foreign wars and the TSA assault on travelers. So while Ron Paul is not that great he is better than mainline Republicans in many respects. Rand has filibustered against the drone program.

The Ron Paul agenda (like all Republicans) benefits the top 1% at most. The folks that perpetrated the 9/11 attacks are almost all certainly in the top 1% while nearly all members of the 9/11 Truth Movement are part of the bottom 99%. So the next time you get asked to contribute to a Ron or Rand Paul “Money Bomb” just say NO.

Tarpley on Ron Paul’s Austerity Plan: