Dwain Deets: A Boeing 757 Hit the Pentagon on 9/11

The material in this post was covered on Jim Fetzer’s show 12/18/2013. You can play the show in your browser or download it here.

I got an email a few days ago stating that I needed to see Dwain Deets’ presentation from the DC 9/11 conference last September. I was told that Dwain was claiming that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon after all. Dwain is not claiming that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon but most likely a modified 757 was used. I was somewhat taken aback by that statement.

Dwain was a fellow speaker at the Vancouver Hearings in June 2012 and he was a “no plane” guy at that time. By “no planes” we generally mean no commercial planes hit the Twin Towers, the Pentagon or crashed in Shanksville. Transponder data obtained by Pilots for 9/11 Truth as well as Bureau of Transportation Statistics data back that up. The debate then centers around if real planes could perform the feats observed on 9/11.

I generally stay out of the plane/no plane debate. I’m not a video expert nor do I pretend to be one. My “official” position is that no commercial plane crashed anywhere on 9/11. As Jim Fetzer points out:  Flights 11 and 77 were not even scheduled that day and the planes corresponding to Flights 93 and 175 were not formally taken out of service until 28 September 2005.

Here is Dwain’s presentation:

A few points immediately came to mind after viewing Dwain’s presentation:

1. No 757 can fly that fast that low. It’s aerodynamically impossible. The engines can’t suck the air through fast enough at ground level. This YouTube clip features Joe Keith (who designed the Boeing shaker system) who states that the air is too thick at ground level for a commercial Boeing to fly 500 miles per hour. The plane would have broken apart long before it hit the Pentagon.

2. Dwain’s contention is that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon at a speed approaching 500 miles per hour and like the F4 in the video below then turned into “confetti” upon impact. The biggest problem with this scenario is that there is no mechanism that can get a Boeing 757 anywhere near that speed at ground level. The F4 impacting the wall is not flying but it’s bolted down to a track. A real plane would take off at that speed.

3. The parts that were found at the Pentagon WERE NOT from a 757. Parts from a different type of plane were planted there.



4. There is no photographic or video evidence that shows a 757 hitting the Pentagon. They didn’t even produce fake footage. Those 4 frames of whatever it was they released are NOT a 757.


5. The GPS system being publicly available would have no bearing on a Black Op like 9/11. Black Ops doesn’t need to wait for technology to become publicly available before they pull off an operation.

6. The hole in the Pentagon was not produced by a 757. It was produced by a shape-charged mini-nuke

physics911pentagonHole7. We see toasted cars near the Pentagon on 9/11 which lends credence to the theory that that the Pentagon was nuked. The toasted cars were all over Lower Manhattan on 9/11.

pentagon toasted cars

If No Plane Hit the Pentagon Then What Really Happened?

Radiation Expert Claims High-Radiation Readings Near Pentagon After 9/11 Indicates Depleted Uranium Used

By Greg Szymanski


Two high profile radiation experts concur Pentagon strike involved use of a missile. Also Geiger counter readings right after the attack shows high levels of radiation 12 miles away from Pentagon crash site. A radiation expert and high-ranking Army Major, who once headed the military’s depleted uranium project, both contend the Pentagon was hit by missile, not a commercial jetliner, adding high radiation readings after the strike indicate depleted uranium also may have been used. “I’m not an explosives or crash site expert, but I am highly knowledgeable in causes and effects related to nuclear radiation contamination. What happened at the Pentagon is highly suspicious, leading me to believe a missile with a depleted uranium warhead may have been used,” said radiation expert Leuren Moret in a telephone conversation this week from her Berkeley, CA home. Moret, who has spent a life time working in the nuclear field, first as a staff scientist at the Livermore Nuclear Weapons Laboratory in California, is now a member of The Radiation and Public Health Project (RPHP), a privately funded group studying the devastating effects of depleted uranium especially in Iraq and Afghanistan. Regarding the missile theory, it is also backed up by retired Army Maj. Doug Rokke, a PhD educational physics and former top military expert banished from the Pentagon after the military failed to follow regulations regarding the use, clean up and medical treatment regarding the use of depleted uranium. “When you look at the whole thing, especially the crash site void of airplane parts, the size of the hole left in the building and the fact the projectile’s impact penetrated numerous concrete walls, it looks like the work of a missile,” said Maj. Rokke from his Rantoul, IL home this week. “And when you look at the damage, it was obviously a missile. Also, if you look at the WTC and the disturbing flash hitting the tower right before the impact of the airplane, it also looks like a missile was used.” And to prove the government’s jetliner theory is wrong, Moret said the quick actions of a friend near the Pentagon on the morning of 9/11, provide even more suspicion. Moret recalls on the tragic morning that once she saw the jetliner strike the twin towers and then heard about the Pentagon crash, she immediately called a close friend in Alexandria VA, Dr. Janette Sherman. Thinking radiation might be involved, she quickly asked Dr. Sherman, 77, a radiation expert and medical doctor who lived about 12 miles from the crash site, to get a Geiger counter reading. What the pair of experts found is astonishing. What they found is not only astonishing but four years after 9/11, what’s even more incredible is that their findings have been completely ignored by most everyone, including the Bush administration, the 9/11 Commission and the mainstream media, all who appear more interested in rubber stamping the official 9/11 story then getting at the real truth. “Dr. Sherman was downwind from the Pentagon on 9/11 and her Geiger counter readings show an extremely high reading, a reading of more than eight to ten times higher than normal,” said Moret, also an expert in the cause and effects of depleted uranium. “Dr. Sherman, who is well-respected radiation expert herself, then went about contacting the proper authorities in order to try and alert emergency responders of the radiation risk at the Pentagon crash site. And we have also kept photos of the Geiger counter readings in order to verify what Dr. Sherman found 12 miles away.”

Leuren Moret and Doug Rokke believed that a missile struck the Pentagon and depleted uranium was involved. In light of what we know happened in New York to the World Trade Center buildings (at least four were nuked) it appears that enriched uranium was involved in the Pentagon attack. The toasted cars at the Pentagon are eerily similar to what we saw in Lower Manhattan leading me to believe that the Pentagon was neutron nuked. Some Pentagon researchers believe that a bomb was planted inside the Pentagon. That appears to be more likely than a missile with a nuclear warhead hitting the Pentagon. If that is true then whatever happened on the outside of the building was just scenery for the public.

5 thoughts on “Dwain Deets: A Boeing 757 Hit the Pentagon on 9/11

  1. Don, I just wanted to say that I think your work is high quality. I have recently noticed some slanging matches with One Born Free.
    In my opinion One Born Free is simply a worthless individual as far as the search for the truth goes. He is a completely obnoxious and moronic piece of detritus from the pits of hell. The gap between the way he perceives himself to be and the reality is a gaping chasm.
    I knew he was a total waste of time and space when I heard him say towards the end of an interview with Jim Fetzer, that he thought that the WTC 7 footage was fake.
    As soon as I heard that I knew that here was someone not worth wasting a minute upon, for he seems completely without logic to me.
    There is simply no logic in the perpetrators creating fabricated footage that is completely damning and reveals them as liars. It’s pretty obvious.
    The proposal that everything has to be proven and authenticated is simply childish nonsense. Just trash. You could not prove even that New York city or even the Twin towers ever existed using his farcical “technique”. It’s sickening, but these fools represent a tiny poisonous backwater within the truth movement. they really do not matter.
    The way to respond to pieces of trash like OBF is not to engage in slanging matches and let the piece of crap upset you, but rather simply ignore them and eventually they will go away.
    Either way they are not going to have any real negative impact, these people are simply there to waste time. As to whether these people are”agents” or simply annoying moronic dickheads is actually beside the point. The information and analysis offered by OBF is of no value whatsoever. I choose to simply ignore his existence. It makes no difference whether he is an agent because he is a noxious weed source of pollution either way.
    The nature of the 911 truth movement means that we will never be able to prevent people trying to poison the well, our best tactic in my opinion is simply to deny oxygen to these individuals.
    As I tried to tell Jim Fetzer when he was having Santilli issues “Only a fool argues with a fool.”
    I despise OBF, as I think I have made obvious, I would never attack him personally however, because to acknowledge his existence would give him more credit and attention than he is worth.
    Anyway, that’s my two cents. Thanks for your work.

    James Robertson.
    PS- Sorry for swearing.

    • Thanks for your thoughtful comments. I think you’ve got OBF pegged. His attacks are almost the same as the Judy Wood crew and there is no doubt she is affiliated with the ADL in some form or fashion. He is a lowlife no doubt but some of the Judy Wood crew are even worse believe it or not. We haven’t gotten any death threats since OBF and Simon Shill popped up.

      I just wanted to point out I think OBF and SS are indeed working for the other side. I think I’ve made my point there and I’m going to start ignoring him.

      I’m glad you appreciate my efforts. You are the type of person I’m trying to reach. Stay tuned for a big article on the Sept Clueless guys.

      PS – this is a PG-13 blog so don’t worry about a few curse words especially if they are directed towards OBF. Hopefully Fetzer bans him in the near future.

  2. I also want to express my admiration and appreciation for the work you have done. It’s very helpful. I agree with the assessment here of obf and shack. But there’s much more going on at that fetzer thread.

    Clare remarks on her tireless efforts to “act as a peacemaker intellectually.” It is very important to Clare that Jim, and whoever else she can browbeat, buys into these video issues. Why is that?

    Seems to me Clare is aiming for some kind of Hegelian synthesis here… get these two sides to come together somehow… the truth is in the middle sort of thing. Her cloying, mewling persona does not hide her breathless arrogance and patient zeal to steer the conversation to this synthesis, come hell or high water. And the trouble is that one side (obf, shack, et. al.) is talking in circles forever about video fakery, and the other side (you, Jim, et. al.) is talking about very inconvenient factual evidence that nuclear weapons were used in NYC on the day of 911 (laws of physics, chemistry of the dust samples, etc.). And you can’t bring a truthful side and a fake-full side together into synthesis, without taking something away from the truth. And so this whole exercise is a matter of stalling, delaying, wasting time, distracting, etc., by getting as many good researchers as possible to spin their wheels on video and photographs, which themselves have come from the spooks and their minions in the media. This is about shifting the discussion over to *their* territory, the territory of lies and illusion, and away from the inconvenient facts. Facts that incriminate the perps, and we are not talking about the media, disgusting and pathetic whores that they are. Their role was mostly after the fact. That’s what Clare, obf and shack want to focus on. We are talking about the people who spent untold hours rigging those buildings to explode into dust, and who paid for that, and who facilitated it, and who supplied the nukes. 911 took a lot of planning.

    I think the fakery has been deliberately set into the machine (now multiple times with Sandy Hook and Boston, etc. to reinforce the “reality” of fakery). Point being to waste the time of good researchers and direct their ire to scapegoats and minions. It’s a limited hangout and stalling tactic. Now that the science of 911 makes sense, the focus needs to go to the crime: means, motivation and opportunity. And that’s what all this nonsense is about — to prevent that discussion. Just my 2c. Great work you’ve done.

    • Thanks for the thoughtful comments! I know there are people like you and James who lurk over there at radiofetzer. I keep posting in an effort to inject some real info into the discussion. Not that I know everything but I’ve put in a lot of hours of study on 9/11 and I think this info needs to get out there. Hopefully enough people will find it useful and build on it.

      Clare seems to have a knack for falling for the limited hang out types. Yes people like Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson have put out SOME good info. But the real truth seeker needs to realize that Judy Wood, Andrew Johnson, Simon Shack and OBF et al are there as gatekeepers to limit the discussion. They don’t have good intentions. One CAN’T have a synthesis with these types of people as you so adroitly point out. Clare tries to see the good in them when there isn’t any. I think it’s far more productive to call a spade a spade and move on then to try to exchange ideas with a known shill. There is no give and take with shills.

      Above ALL else the gatekeepers are there to waste time. You are right on the money there. And THAT is why I’m calling them out now. I know I’m not the only sick of the delay tactics of the OBFs of the world. In fact I’m lobbying Fetzer to block those guys from posting so they can’t clog the discussion up with this nukes don’t exist bullshit.

  3. FYI to everyone who follows this blog and the show threads over at radiofetzer: I HEAR YOU! You guys think that Sept Clues is a big waste of time and only around to stall and delay. I couldn’t agree more. Ian Greenhalgh and I have written an article on Sept Clues and it will be posted in the VERY near future. Ian is a very talented guy and if you like my stuff you’ll enjoy reading Ian’s material as well.

    I like Clare on a personal level but I’m as disgusted as everyone else is with her efforts to promote Shack’s “research.”

    People want answers as to what really happened on 9/11. If you come to this blog looking for them I’m not going to waste your time by running around in circles with the Shacks and OBFs of the world. When I do a show with Fetzer I’m not going to waste 2 hours of your life talking in circles about Simon Shack’s great “research.”

Comments are closed.