Dwain Deets: A Boeing 757 Hit the Pentagon on 9/11

The material in this post was covered on Jim Fetzer’s show 12/18/2013. You can play the show in your browser or download it here.

I got an email a few days ago stating that I needed to see Dwain Deets’ presentation from the DC 9/11 conference last September. I was told that Dwain was claiming that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon after all. Dwain is not claiming that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon but most likely a modified 757 was used. I was somewhat taken aback by that statement.

Dwain was a fellow speaker at the Vancouver Hearings in June 2012 and he was a “no plane” guy at that time. By “no planes” we generally mean no commercial planes hit the Twin Towers, the Pentagon or crashed in Shanksville. Transponder data obtained by Pilots for 9/11 Truth as well as Bureau of Transportation Statistics data back that up. The debate then centers around if real planes could perform the feats observed on 9/11.

I generally stay out of the plane/no plane debate. I’m not a video expert nor do I pretend to be one. My “official” position is that no commercial plane crashed anywhere on 9/11. As Jim Fetzer points out:  Flights 11 and 77 were not even scheduled that day and the planes corresponding to Flights 93 and 175 were not formally taken out of service until 28 September 2005.

Here is Dwain’s presentation:

A few points immediately came to mind after viewing Dwain’s presentation:

1. No 757 can fly that fast that low. It’s aerodynamically impossible. The engines can’t suck the air through fast enough at ground level. This YouTube clip features Joe Keith (who designed the Boeing shaker system) who states that the air is too thick at ground level for a commercial Boeing to fly 500 miles per hour. The plane would have broken apart long before it hit the Pentagon.

2. Dwain’s contention is that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon at a speed approaching 500 miles per hour and like the F4 in the video below then turned into “confetti” upon impact. The biggest problem with this scenario is that there is no mechanism that can get a Boeing 757 anywhere near that speed at ground level. The F4 impacting the wall is not flying but it’s bolted down to a track. A real plane would take off at that speed.

3. The parts that were found at the Pentagon WERE NOT from a 757. Parts from a different type of plane were planted there.



4. There is no photographic or video evidence that shows a 757 hitting the Pentagon. They didn’t even produce fake footage. Those 4 frames of whatever it was they released are NOT a 757.


5. The GPS system being publicly available would have no bearing on a Black Op like 9/11. Black Ops doesn’t need to wait for technology to become publicly available before they pull off an operation.

6. The hole in the Pentagon was not produced by a 757. It was produced by a shape-charged mini-nuke

physics911pentagonHole7. We see toasted cars near the Pentagon on 9/11 which lends credence to the theory that that the Pentagon was nuked. The toasted cars were all over Lower Manhattan on 9/11.

pentagon toasted cars

If No Plane Hit the Pentagon Then What Really Happened?

Radiation Expert Claims High-Radiation Readings Near Pentagon After 9/11 Indicates Depleted Uranium Used

By Greg Szymanski


Two high profile radiation experts concur Pentagon strike involved use of a missile. Also Geiger counter readings right after the attack shows high levels of radiation 12 miles away from Pentagon crash site. A radiation expert and high-ranking Army Major, who once headed the military’s depleted uranium project, both contend the Pentagon was hit by missile, not a commercial jetliner, adding high radiation readings after the strike indicate depleted uranium also may have been used. “I’m not an explosives or crash site expert, but I am highly knowledgeable in causes and effects related to nuclear radiation contamination. What happened at the Pentagon is highly suspicious, leading me to believe a missile with a depleted uranium warhead may have been used,” said radiation expert Leuren Moret in a telephone conversation this week from her Berkeley, CA home. Moret, who has spent a life time working in the nuclear field, first as a staff scientist at the Livermore Nuclear Weapons Laboratory in California, is now a member of The Radiation and Public Health Project (RPHP), a privately funded group studying the devastating effects of depleted uranium especially in Iraq and Afghanistan. Regarding the missile theory, it is also backed up by retired Army Maj. Doug Rokke, a PhD educational physics and former top military expert banished from the Pentagon after the military failed to follow regulations regarding the use, clean up and medical treatment regarding the use of depleted uranium. “When you look at the whole thing, especially the crash site void of airplane parts, the size of the hole left in the building and the fact the projectile’s impact penetrated numerous concrete walls, it looks like the work of a missile,” said Maj. Rokke from his Rantoul, IL home this week. “And when you look at the damage, it was obviously a missile. Also, if you look at the WTC and the disturbing flash hitting the tower right before the impact of the airplane, it also looks like a missile was used.” And to prove the government’s jetliner theory is wrong, Moret said the quick actions of a friend near the Pentagon on the morning of 9/11, provide even more suspicion. Moret recalls on the tragic morning that once she saw the jetliner strike the twin towers and then heard about the Pentagon crash, she immediately called a close friend in Alexandria VA, Dr. Janette Sherman. Thinking radiation might be involved, she quickly asked Dr. Sherman, 77, a radiation expert and medical doctor who lived about 12 miles from the crash site, to get a Geiger counter reading. What the pair of experts found is astonishing. What they found is not only astonishing but four years after 9/11, what’s even more incredible is that their findings have been completely ignored by most everyone, including the Bush administration, the 9/11 Commission and the mainstream media, all who appear more interested in rubber stamping the official 9/11 story then getting at the real truth. “Dr. Sherman was downwind from the Pentagon on 9/11 and her Geiger counter readings show an extremely high reading, a reading of more than eight to ten times higher than normal,” said Moret, also an expert in the cause and effects of depleted uranium. “Dr. Sherman, who is well-respected radiation expert herself, then went about contacting the proper authorities in order to try and alert emergency responders of the radiation risk at the Pentagon crash site. And we have also kept photos of the Geiger counter readings in order to verify what Dr. Sherman found 12 miles away.”

Leuren Moret and Doug Rokke believed that a missile struck the Pentagon and depleted uranium was involved. In light of what we know happened in New York to the World Trade Center buildings (at least four were nuked) it appears that enriched uranium was involved in the Pentagon attack. The toasted cars at the Pentagon are eerily similar to what we saw in Lower Manhattan leading me to believe that the Pentagon was neutron nuked. Some Pentagon researchers believe that a bomb was planted inside the Pentagon. That appears to be more likely than a missile with a nuclear warhead hitting the Pentagon. If that is true then whatever happened on the outside of the building was just scenery for the public.