Jim Fetzer Real Deal Appearance 7/9/12

wordpress analytics

Anonymous WTC Collapse Video

1.  WTC2 – :13 “wheatchex” as Judy would call them are observed being ejected with comet trails of dust. Evidence of high explosive   energy.

2. :19  pyroclastic clouds observed coming around the North Tower

3. :27  paper observed floating down the street. WTC2 has been turned to dust.

4. :42  wall of pyroclastic cloud moves down the street. Cloud engulfs the fire trucks

5. WTC1: 1:59

6. 2:26 North Tower explodes in every direction. The building melts into a dust cloud. Looks like a bannana peeling

7. 2:39 spire observed. Mushroom cloud starts rising

8. 2:47 massive amount of pyroclastic flow moving down the street

9. 2:55 Dark mushroom cloud looms over NYC. Massive amount of explosive energy required for this

10. 3:17 WTC 7 

11. 3:32 Mushroom cloud starts rising

12. 3:35 pyrolcastic flow once again engulfs Lower Manhattan

Car Park to the Right of the White Building:

Toasted Cars:

NYC 9/11

Nagaski 1945

Hiroshima 1945

Penatagon 9/11

2/19/13 UPDATE from Ed Ward MD:

Correction: 9-11 WTCs 1, 2, 6, and 7 Neutron Nuked.

Correction: 9-11 WTCs 1, 2, 6, and 7 Neutron Nuked. by Ed Ward, MD http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/736

Prior to peer review by Donald Fox, I have noted that WTC 7 was not nuked since there was no pyroclastic cloud nor residual heat.  https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/2013/01/20/dr-judy-wood-911-gatekeeper-extraordinaire/  “I believe there are problems with a nuke in WTC 7. 1. The residual heat signature only lasted a couple of days, which would be more consistent with nuke debris spread from WTC 1. 2. I looked at film of WTC 7, and didn’t see a pyroclastic flow.”

Don responded with: “Check out the YouTube clip on my post from 7/9/12: https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/2012/07/09/jim-fetzer-real-deal-appearance-7912/. There is massive pyroclastic flow as Building 7 “collapses.”

I responded with: “Best video I’ve seen of 7 and indeed there is pyroclastic flow, there is still the problem of residual heat. Perhaps like WTC 6 where there is documented proof of tampering with the heat signatures – 1 site showed residual heat at 6 while another site using the same data showed NO residual heat – See Update: The US Government’s Usage of Atomic Bombs – Domestic – WTC


Based on your cited video, it appears that there was indeed a neutron nuke in 7 too. That would make 1, 2, 6, and 7 – All nuked. Thanks for the link.”

So, I went back and examined the thermal images – no evidence of tampering was noted (nothing like the crude blackening of WTC 6).  Indeed, there is minimal heat right after 7 was demolished and it still looks more like WTC 2 residue.  But, very shortly after that, 3 large heat zones appear – linear, even spaced – 1 dead center and one on each side.  It just took a while for the heat to transfer up.  This would correlate with 3 surface to slightly sub-surface  micro nukes in WTC 7.  Set to explode just after/during the regular demolition would account for the more lateral flow of the pyroclastic flow.

To date: 4 WTC buildings nuked using 10 micro neutron nukes total- most likely scenario. . WTCs 1 and 2 – 1 in the basement – shook people out of the building, 1 at ground level – last to go off, and 1 about  the 60th floor give or take a few.  3 for each building.

WTC 6 –  Excellent evidence of what 1 micro neutron nuke can do.  Only 8 stories high, but it also left a hole 45 feet deep – sub ground level detonation.

WTC 7 –  The heat signatures indicate 3 micro neutron nukes – sub ground level detonation.

That makes a total of 10 focused micro neutron nukes needed to account for all the evidence.

Ed Ward, MD – http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/ ; https://www.facebook.com/EdWardMD3 ;

Judy Wood’s cold fusion scam – http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/01/16/dr-steven-jones-and-dr-judy-wood-lie-about-traces-of-tritium-and-neutron-nukes/

Update: Proven 9-11 Nukes –  http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/proven-9-11-nukes-us-government-involvement/

24 thoughts on “Jim Fetzer Real Deal Appearance 7/9/12

  1. Pingback: Correction: 9-11 WTCs 1, 2, 6, and 7 Neutron Nuked. « Ed Ward, MD's Weblog of Tyranny

  2. Nukes installed during construction. material and technology updates most likely occured. The contracts spoke of a 50 story criteria for nuke and other demolition presets. Dr. Ward’s research discovering a subbasement placement below WTC6 and therefore excavation indicate these contracts used by Skilling and Associates to be fraudulent, not in their existence, but in matters of their substance and content. The possibility also exists that the content of the contracts is true and accurate, and the nuke placed under WTC6 was not set until much later. The technology mentioned is of a later vintage, i trust?

    Extensive delays in completing WTC 7 had to do with numerous serious complaints from engineers and others that these demolition systems were going in and substandard work was the norm in many areas. The Nixon/Rockefeller controlled federal and NYC/NJ Port Authorities signed off on all of it. George H.W. Bush was ambassador to the U.N.at the time, and as being so would know the details of these events and contracts.

    • Maximum nuke life is 3 years. After 3 years enough tritium has degraded that the bomb is pretty much useless. Thanks for the comment.

  3. If you feel I am not pretty enough to add to information concerning placement of much of these demolition systems, one fact will hold true forever. I was there documenting it while it was going in and you were not. Ask questions.

    • I approve the comments manually so there may be a gap in getting them approved. I have to sleep some time!

      My problem with nukes placed there during construction is that nukes only have a shelf life of 20-25 years. 30+ year old nukes aren’t likely to be effective. Tritium has a half life of 12.3 years. Perhaps the original bombs were swapped out at some point?

      Either way it’s a minor point. NYC was nuked on 9/11 no matter when the bombs were planted.

      • Nukes would have destroyed the BATHTUB under the WTC. Read Dr Judy Wood’s book instead of spouting nuke-nonsense.

  4. Nuclear reactions occur at over 8,000,000º C. This would be very apparent. Steel in freefall is dissolving to dust. Nuke do not explain any of this.

    • Actually nukes explain it perfectly:

      When matter is elevated to temperatures hotter than the surface of the Sun, molecular dissociation results. Molecular Dissociation (MD) is easy to understand once we realize that there are four (4) states of matter: solid, liquid, gas, and plasma. Just as ice has trouble surviving in water or steam, molecules have trouble surviving in plasma, which is highly energetic (ie, extremely hot). When molecules dissociate, they leave behind loose atoms and fragments of molecules. In other words, extremely small particles. In this sense, it is correct to think of molecular dissociation as disintegration.

      Nukes are known to blast material into very small particles and that’s what we see on 9/11. Minute particles of the WTC buildings were found up and down the Eastern Seaboard. ONLY nukes can explain that.

      • I do think the isotopic analysis of the dust indicates suspiciously nuclear looking isotopes. Someone is going to have to get me over the lack of incandescence – Even with 30% of the curtain wall being glass, if you’re suggesting vaporizing steel, I don’t know how it wasn’t blindingly bright. Well that is if the video is real.

        Thanks for your reply!

    • People who bray on about “nukes” and “nano-thermite” are controlled opposition. Nukes would have destroyed the BATHTUB under the WTCs and the BATHTUB was still standing after the event. Nano-BS-thermite could not turn the buildings into dust and there would have been 3 times the debris you see after the event.

      Please read Dr Judy Wood’s book. She doesn’t bring a theory. She brings EVIDENCE.

  5. I think any Nukes would have left tail-tail radiation and I have not heard of that happening.
    The Movie Zeitgeist had many 9-11 clips and several showed very large core I-Beams that had melted which required temperatures well above what “Jet A” burns at. The 2 most important things for me were that no engines were found either in NY or at the Pentagon “crash sites” and that both the Pentagon and the WTC housed all the investigative materials for the massive amount of money that the Pentagon “lost” which was immediately never talked about again…

    More here: Exposing the fraud of 9/11 in 22 minutes – YouTube

    High Ranking US Major General Exposes September 11

    • All sorts of evidence for nukes on 9/11. The USGS dust samples contained uranium, thorium, barium, strontium, yttrium, chromium and lithium – all indicative of nuclear fission. The DOE water samples contained elevated levels of tritium which indicates nuclear fusion. 9/11 was a nuclear event. Check out Jeff Prager’s Vancouver presentation here on my blog and my 12/22/12 post for more info.

    • Unfortunately, Samuel T Cohen, the father of the neutron bomb disagrees with you. Just some nuke facts from Mr. Neutron Bomb…

      Re: Shame http://glasstone.blogspot.com/2006/05/revised-edition-of-sam-cohens-shame-is.html

      Cohen points out that the neutron bomb doesn’t have the collateral damage of fallout, blast and heat effects that occurred in Hiroshima, but enhanced neutron flash radiation: `in about a thousandth of a second it will seriously irradiate enemy soldiers (in tanks, self-propelled artillery vehicles, armored personnel carriers, in field bunkers, and most other places where they may be) out to a distance of about half to three-quarters of a mile for a warhead yield of a kiloton… Roughly half will die, most rather quickly from shock to the central nervous system. … What doesn’t it do? Well, for start-offs, when the war is over the civilian areas — villages, towns, cities — will be in just about the shape they were in before it started. There will be no lingering radioactivity [residual doses from neutron induced activity in soil are insignificant compared to the flash dose of neutrons, and it decays quickly as in Hiroshima] prevent occupation of these areas; in fact, they can be reentered almost immediately.

      Also a nice read…

      DECAY RATE. The decay rate of radioactive

      materials from a single weapon can be determined with fair accuracy by using the ABCM1A1 radiac calculator, which is a component of the M28A1 calculator set or by using newly developed automated aids. To make a quick estimate of fallout decay, analysts decrease the intensity by a factor of ten as the time after the burst increases by multiples of seven. For example, a dose rate of 50 cGy/hour at 1 hour after the burst decays to 5 cGy/hour in 7 hours and to about 0.50 cGy/hour in 49 hours. Boundaries for significant areas of newly depositedfallout are based on dose rates. For short-term (24-hour) occupancy of an area, the dose rate is 20 cGy/hour at 1 hour after the burst. For longer term occupancy, the dose rate is 10 cGy/hour at1 hour after the burst. FM 3-12 and FM 3-22 contain specific details of fallout prediction, decay,and total dose calculations.

      Craters caused by surface and shallow subsurface bursts will be contaminated by neutron-induced radiation and residual radioactive fission products. The activity in and around the crater can be estimated one hour after detonation, and the decay rate established as discussed above. http://nige.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/fm101-31-1.pdf

      Related Articles

      Update: The US Government’s Usage of Atomic Bombs – Domestic – WTC http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm

      Update:Proven 9-11 Nukes = US Government Involvement http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/proven-9-11-nukes-us-government-involvement/ Updated Broken Links

      ’9-11 Fake Video’ Stars – The JSTAR Clones http://www.rense.com/general92/911fk.htm

      Why Covert Ops Must Have `Fake’ Video

      No Windows on Flight 175 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRC4lCQuBmc&feature=related

      Ed Ward, MD

      Ed Ward MD’s Weblog of Tyranny http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/ http://www.facebook.com/EdWardMD3 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/

  6. Thermite and thermate are two substances that can burn at 2,500 degrees F, thus melting steel. This analysis was made by retired USAF Maj. General Parton, an expert in the study of explosives. He had examined the heavily damaged Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City shortly after the bombing there, back in 1995.

    • Thermite cannot possibly be the main causal factor for the destruction of the WTC buildings. Thermite is not explosive. The buildings exploded. The maximum detonation velocity for nanothermite is 895 meters per second – well below the 3,200 meters per second to turn concrete into dust and the 6,100 meters per second to cause steel to explode. Thermite gets very hot, it produces molten iron, it can melt steel, and it can catch things on fire, but it is absolutely not an explosive.

      Nanothermite cannot eject a 300 ton chunk of the North Tower up at a 45° angle and out 600 feet into the Winter Garden. Neither cannot turn steel and concrete into very fine dust. Only nukes can account for these phenomena.


      • A little tidbit – takes 1 gm of thermite to melt 1 gm of steel, 1 ton of thermite to melt 1 ton of steel. 1 billion lbs of thermite to melt 1 billion pounds of steel. Yeah, that could happen.

  7. If your are going to source Dr. Judy Wood, then don’t distort her information. There were no nukes. Are you an agent of deception?

    • Judy Wood is full of shit. Evidence abounds for fission AND fusion at Ground Zero. You won’t even use your real name and you have the balls to call me an agent of deception. Gutless chicken shit.

      • Suggest more appropriate sock puppet gutless chicken sh!t spreading BS passed off as ‘science’. Coincidentally, one of the prime objectives of COINTELPRO.

  8. Pingback: sitfu.com - WTC Collapse Video – Pyroclastic Cloud, Toasted Cars – Video

Comments are closed.