Don Fox’s Vancouver PowerPoint

It’s HERE! I have uploaded my 61 slide PowerPoint (.pptx) that I presented in Vancouver. This PP is a good chunk of my 8 years of 9/11 research. Certainly the PowerPoint was better than my public speaking but it was important to get this info out to the public. Yes folks, we were nuked on 9/11. Jeff Prager has done extensive research on the dust that was collected by the USGS and they found uranium, thorium, barium and strontium among other elements which proves fission took place. Elevated tritium levels indicate fusion. It’s pretty simple folks: massive explosions, pyroclastic flow, mushroom clouds and radioactive fallout = nukes.

Click here to view Don Fox’s PowerPoint presentation (.ppt)

29 thoughts on “Don Fox’s Vancouver PowerPoint

  1. Pingback: 9/11 Truth will out: The Vancouver Hearings II |  SHOAH

  2. Don,

    Thanks for the honorable mention of my effort “Proven 9 11 Nukes” http://rense.com/general92/pr911.htm ,

    Seems you also noted – The US Government’s Usage of Atomic Bombs – Domestic – WTC
    http://www.serendipity.li/wot/ed_ward/use_of_abombs.htm

    Things really started coming together with Update: The US Government’s Usage of Atomic Bombs – Domestic – WTC
    http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm

    All but the 35 nukes BS (Anon Phys/Spook whom I tutored right after US Gov Usage came out). The 35 nukes is BS (bogus science). Nukes were only needed and could only be used in the core – couldn’t be hidden when they went off anywhere else.. 5 to 7 nukes for the 3 buildings total most likely scenario.. The fast igniter ICF is BS too. But outside of that pretty much on the money.

    Ed

    Ed Ward, MD

  3. Don,

    Thanks for the reply. Take a look at Mr. neutron bomb’s book, Shame – e-book on the net by Samuel Cohen, 2000 – very good read.. 2 problems with 35 nukes – EMP and nuetrons. Neutrons sounce off everything they don’t penetrate, especially after penetration – no room for 35 nukes synchronized. EMP moves like they air and is also a major problem. The nuclear program (See US Government…. linked above) I ran fits almost perfectly for WTC 1/2 with 3 nukes – see WTC 6 for the power of 1 nuke. No debris and a hole 45 feet deep. 3 nukes max at WTC 1/2. They don’t tend to experiment on black flags. The tend to use the tried and works when it comes to murder and treason. Think simple and used before, so they know exactly what to expect. See Operation Northwoods they have a basic simple tried and worked plan. http://www.stumbleupon.com/content/1hjDXt They upgrade the plan, but only with what they know works, IMO based on facts.

    My Best to You and Yours,

    Ed

    • Re: Shame http://glasstone.blogspot.com/2006/05/revised-edition-of-sam-cohens-shame-is.html

      Cohen points out that the neutron bomb doesn’t have the collateral damage of fallout, blast and heat effects that occurred in Hiroshima, but enhanced neutron flash radiation: ‘in about a thousandth of a second it will seriously irradiate enemy soldiers (in tanks, self-propelled artillery vehicles, armored personnel carriers, in field bunkers, and most other places where they may be) out to a distance of about half to three-quarters of a mile for a warhead yield of a kiloton… Roughly half will die, most rather quickly from shock to the central nervous system. … What doesn’t it do? Well, for start-offs, when the war is over the civilian areas — villages, towns, cities — will be in just about the shape they were in before it started. There will be no lingering radioactivity [residual doses from neutron induced activity in soil are insignificant compared to the flash dose of neutrons, and it decays quickly as in Hiroshima] prevent occupation of these areas; in fact, they can be reentered almost immediately.

      Also a nice read…
      DECAY RATE. The decay rate of radioactive
      materials from a single weapon can be determined with fair accuracy by using the ABCM1A1 radiac calculator, which is a componentof the M28A1 calculator set or by using newlydeveloped automated aids. To make a quick estimate of fallout decay, analysts decrease theintensity by a factor of ten as the time after theburst increases by multiples of seven. Forexample, a dose rate of 50 cGy/hour at 1 hourafter the burst decays to 5 cGy/hour in 7 hoursand to about 0.50 cGy/hour in 49 hours. Boundaries for significant areas of newly depositedfallout are based on dose rates. For short-term (24-hour) occupancy of an area, the dose rate is20 cGy/hour at 1 hour after the burst. For longerterm occupancy, the dose rate is 10 cGy/hour at1 hour after the burst. FM 3-12 and FM 3-22 contain specific details of fallout prediction, decay,and total dose calculations.

      Craters caused by surface and shallow subsurface bursts will be contaminated by neutron-induced radiation and residual radioactive fission products. The activity in and around thecrater can be estimated one hour after detonation, and the decay rate established as discussed above. http://nige.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/fm101-31-1.pdf

      As for your quoted fission proof…. Did you happen to look the uses for them? Virtual all of them can be in computer monitors, computers, paint, etc, et al. One really has to go to the isotopes that were found, then it would be proven. Also, note when they tested for radiation – like fision byproducts – the machine used is quoted at 50%, so the slightly above normal reading would have to be multiplied x2 for the actual reading, IMO on facts. That’s why I locked on Tritium. Any dust, melted steel, etc, merely needs to be tested for the stable isotopes of the elements – they will be good for decades.

      Best…,

      Ed

      Proven 9-11 Nukes = US Government Involvement http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/proven-9-11-nukes-us-government-involvement/

      ’9-11 Fake Video’ Stars – The JSTAR Clones http://www.rense.com/general92/911fk.htm
      Why Covert Ops Must Have ‘Fake’ Video

      No Windows on Flight 175 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRC4lCQuBmc&feature=related

      • Thanks for the heads up on Sam Cohen’s book – I will check that out ASAP. As a far as fission proof at Ground Zero uranium, thorium and chromium stick out like a sore thumb even if the isotopes are not known. Some of the samples were still fissioning when collected and the China Syndrome Aftermath (1,500 F temps at GZ in March 2002) prove fission. Prager got a 3-D image that shows how deep the China Syndrome was going at GZ.

        Thanks for your thoughtful comments.

        Don

    • You didn’t do anything wrong Ed! I just have to manually approve the comments. With a FT job it sometimes takes a few hours to get them approved.

      • Thanks for the quick response, effort and open address. I know it’s a ton of info. If you have questions for me. Will be glad to address them. Best…

  4. Agree totally with the heat per Dr. Cahill’s studies and noted in New Laws of Physics Noted in WTC Fires and Ignored. http://rense.com/general77/newlaws.htm The isotope is just another nail in a coffin of nukes that is nailed shut. Not so sure I’d say ‘still fissioning’ vs the retained heat of the 1.2 billion pounds of WTC 1,2 and 6 residue that passed through exploding nukes. Nor would I say ‘china sydrome’ as a nuclear meltdown is a tad different in effects, duration and residual than a neutron bomb., although some similar in human exposure.effects. Enjoyed our posts. Thanks Again. Ed

    • The atomization, vaporization, and dustification of these elements can still only be explained by a nuke. Let alone the fission products – which I agree with and note them in US Gov Usage – but it is far down the line of classic textbook nuclear evidence. The atomization, just like everything else, it’s classic textbook evidence of a nuke wherever the elements came from. 😉 I know they were from nukes. You know they were nuke bred or nuke spread (only 2 optons via evidence and basic physic/chem), but it is far down the list of more easily defended and more proven nuke evidence that shows the US government is bastardized, torturous, murderous.and treasonous.

      Best,

    • The USGS collected 35 dust samples. The lowest amount of chromium in any sample contained 86.5 ppm and the highest contained 224 ppm. The lowest amount of thorium in any sample was 5.36 ppm and the highest 30.7 ppm. Check out Jeff Prager’s PowerPoint here on my blog. The big point Jeff makes is that among all these different elements and locations is that the correlation between the concentrations is extremely high. If one element goes up in one sample so do the others. These are not random trace amounts we’re seeing here. There was a process behind this. A fission process.

      • As stated, it works for me:

        “In response to this myriad of disease, a statement of environmental mercury has beenclaimed. That claim is not verified in testing of air and particle debris samples by privatecitizens and organizations. It is possible the mercury quotes are from the federal source of science, the United States Geological Survey’s analysis of the WTC dust debris. The USGS’sleached analysisdid show mercury at the 3rd lowest concentration of metals at the mean value (mv) of 0.011 parts per Billion (ppB). The most abundant element concentration inthe leaching tests was Strontium at 1,000 ppB (1 ppM) – 100,000 times more than themercury value.

        It appears that the leaching of the sample was only partial and inadequateas the reader will see from thespectrometry values. Why would only mercury be quoted when there were so many other more dangerous elements at higher concentrations than mercury? While the regular elements like Copper -mv 136 ppM, Silver – mv 1.66 ppM, and Vanadium – mv 31 ppM, some of the other significant elements were: Barium – mv 533 ppM, Strontium – mv 727 ppM, Cerium – mv 91 ppM, Yttrium – mv 57 ppM, Lanthanum – mv 46 ppM, Molybdenum – mv 11 ppM,Thorium – mv 9 ppM, Uranium – mv 3 ppM, Beryllium – mv 3 ppM, and Cesium – mv 0.6ppM – partial listing. For readers that are not familiar with most of these elements, here isa link to their relevance. ”

        http://www.scribd.com/doc/20737794/The-US-Government-s-Usage-of-Atomic-Bombs-WMDs-in-the-WTCs. I just don’t want to hang my hat on it as ‘THE evidence that proves nukes/, it’s a nail just like the rest, IMO. Massive craters, massive heat to massive mass, absolutely no way it’s NOT a Nuclear Event with tritium present in massive amounts and a 12 year half life and an extremely short equilibrium rate even contained, anaerobic fires, atomization – take a higher rank in my degree of evidence.

        I try not to comment on things I haven’t looked at. I did skim it though and believe it is valid. It’s a good presentation, It’s just not my lead. Everything examined point’s neutron nukes.

        Best,

  5. Thank you for your efforts, time, and exposure of my evidence in your presentation, as well as all your efforts toward the truth. Hope I brought at least a few people to your site.

    My Best To You and Yours,

    Ed

  6. Don Fox & Ed Ward email: Just to keep everyone up to speed…

    Ed,

    We’re continuing to research nukes in the 9/11 context and any contributions you want to make are more than welcome. If you want to write a guest blog or join our email list let me know!!

    Don

    ———————————————

    Don,

    I thought you already let me write a guest blog under your powerpoint presentation. You have been kind, fair and tolerant of the facts and myself – Always a good sign for truth. Yes, nukes is the way, because the evidence individually and in total exposes it. In this age where one must question everything I respect your efforts and appreciate them – You covered a tremendous amount of material in a relatively brief preparation period without my assistance only approval in just my efforts, let alone others. If I can assist your efforts in the research, do not hesitate to ask. I regret not having given more assistance prior, rather than later. If you find ‘errors’ in my research – been extremely probed, but rarely scientifically – Please let me know. I don’t knowingly write Bogus Science.

    My Best to You and Yours,.

    Ed

  7. An update on 9 11 – updating links to lost information – one of vialls links reveals the only pictures of LA Special Operations blowing up 1k ANFO in a pickup truck left on the net – Clearly shows no crater.

    Covert Operations? – Even Joe Vialls Corrupt? Inept? The `mouthpiece’ for Someone Else? Question Everything When Something Doesn’t Add Up. + Samuel Cohen Shame Quotes
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/718

    Vialls alive until 2005, but all he knows is autopilot jive? Mr. here a nuke, there a nuke, everywhere a nuke. He had to make the connection. I used his efforts as reference in US Government’s Usage of Atomic Bombs http://www.serendipity.li/wot/ed_ward/use_of_abombs.htm He had to know. – Not a peep that I can find.

    Where was Nukes in NYC? There was Nukes in Bali http://web.archive.org/web/20050129050637/http://homepage.ntlworld.com/steveseymour/nuke/bali_micro_nuke.htm , Nukes in London http://web.archive.org/web/20030409042415/http://geocities.com/vialls/nukes1.html , Nukes in Indonesia http://web.archive.org/web/20050213043930/http://www.vialls.com/myahudi/embassynuke.html , etc, et al? Where was Nukes in NYC?

    The only nukes Vialls saw were still in Bali, at least until 2003. Complaining the press won’t cover Bali. http://web.archive.org/web/20030409042415/http://geocities.com/vialls/nukes1.html .

    He has two articles on 9 11 that I can find and you’d think he never even heard the word micro nuke?

    Home Run
    Electronically Hijacking the World Trade Center Attack Aircraft
    Copyright Joe Vialls, October 2001 http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/home_run.htm

    The 911 You Were Never Told About – Was The White House Attacked By A Drone Plane With A Dead Pilot?
    http://rense.com/general19/911.htm

    There is simply no way Vialls didn’t instantly ID the same nuke damage he points out abroad. So it seems Vialls most likely scenario is classic CIA spy vs spy vs spy, left hand vs right hand propaganda being used for agitation in those areas. Just my opinion based on SOP and noted facts.

    Just some nuke facts from Mr. Neutron Bomb…

    Re: Shame http://glasstone.blogspot.com/2006/05/revised-edition-of-sam-cohens-shame-is.html

    Cohen points out that the neutron bomb doesn’t have the collateral damage of fallout, blast and heat effects that occurred in Hiroshima, but enhanced neutron flash radiation: `in about a thousandth of a second it will seriously irradiate enemy soldiers (in tanks, self-propelled artillery vehicles, armored personnel carriers, in field bunkers, and most other places where they may be) out to a distance of about half to three-quarters of a mile for a warhead yield of a kiloton… Roughly half will die, most rather quickly from shock to the central nervous system. … What doesn’t it do? Well, for start-offs, when the war is over the civilian areas — villages, towns, cities — will be in just about the shape they were in before it started. There will be no lingering radioactivity [residual doses from neutron induced activity in soil are insignificant compared to the flash dose of neutrons, and it decays quickly as in Hiroshima] prevent occupation of these areas; in fact, they can be reentered almost immediately.

    Also a nice read…
    DECAY RATE. The decay rate of radioactive
    materials from a single weapon can be determined with fair accuracy by using the ABCM1A1 radiac calculator, which is a component of the M28A1 calculator set or by using newly developed automated aids. To make a quick estimate of fallout decay, analysts decrease the intensity by a factor of ten as the time after the burst increases by multiples of seven. For example, a dose rate of 50 cGy/hour at 1 hour after the burst decays to 5 cGy/hour in 7 hours and to about 0.50 cGy/hour in 49 hours. Boundaries for significant areas of newly depositedfallout are based on dose rates. For short-term (24-hour) occupancy of an area, the dose rate is 20 cGy/hour at 1 hour after the burst. For longer term occupancy, the dose rate is 10 cGy/hour at1 hour after the burst. FM 3-12 and FM 3-22 contain specific details of fallout prediction, decay,and total dose calculations.

    Craters caused by surface and shallow subsurface bursts will be contaminated by neutron-induced radiation and residual radioactive fission products. The activity in and around the crater can be estimated one hour after detonation, and the decay rate established as discussed above. http://nige.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/fm101-31-1.pdf

    Related Articles

    Update: The US Government’s Usage of Atomic Bombs – Domestic – WTC http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm

    Update:Proven 9-11 Nukes = US Government Involvement http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/proven-9-11-nukes-us-government-involvement/ Updated Broken Links

    ‘9-11 Fake Video’ Stars – The JSTAR Clones http://www.rense.com/general92/911fk.htm
    Why Covert Ops Must Have `Fake’ Video

    No Windows on Flight 175 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRC4lCQuBmc&feature=related

    Ed Ward, MD

    Ed Ward MD’s Weblog of Tyranny http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/ http://www.facebook.com/EdWardMD3 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/

  8. A few short videos you may like.

    History Channel Molten Metal At Ground Zero – The World Trade Center, Rise and Fall of an American Icon, Richard Riggs amongst a background of nuclear devastion talks about molten metal. 42 seconds http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ogrupgt4mI

    Molten WTC Rock – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ogrupgt4mI

    Molten Metals under WTC 6 weeks after 9/11 – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmMLDG87Sak&feature=related

    A nice compilation of ‘molten steel’ observations. Excerpt from Blueprint for Truth. 8 minutes http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqJSDn5dgJc&feature=related

    The Mystery of WTC 6 – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVs4oMQEpvs&feature=related

  9. Pingback: Mini-Neutron Bombs: A Major Piece of the 9/11 Puzzle | 2012: What's the 'real' truth?

  10. Pingback: Mini-Neutron Bombs: A Major Piece of the 9/11 Puzzle « donaldfox

  11. Pingback: The Vancouver Hearings | 911 Vancouver Hearings

  12. Correction: 9-11 WTCs 1, 2, 6, and 7 Neutron Nuked.
    by Ed Ward, MD http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/736

    Prior to peer review by Donald Fox, I have noted that WTC 7 was not nuked since there was no pyroclastic cloud nor residual heat. https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/2013/01/20/dr-judy-wood-911-gatekeeper-extraordinaire/ “I believe there are problems with a nuke in WTC 7. 1. The residual heat signature only lasted a couple of days, which would be more consistent with nuke debris spread from WTC 1. 2. I looked at film of WTC 7, and didn’t see a pyroclastic flow.”

    Don responded with: “Check out the YouTube clip on my post from 7/9/12: https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/2012/07/09/jim-fetzer-real-deal-appearance-7912/. There is massive pyroclastic flow as Building 7 “collapses.”

    I responded with: “Best video I’ve seen of 7 and indeed there is pyroclastic flow, there is still the problem of residual heat. Perhaps like WTC 6 where there is documented proof of tampering with the heat signatures – 1 site showed residual heat at 6 while another site using the same data showed NO residual heat – See Update: The US Government’s Usage of Atomic Bombs – Domestic – WTC
    http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm
    Based on your cited video, it appears that there was indeed a neutron nuke in 7 too. That would make 1, 2, 6, and 7 – All nuked. Thanks for the link.”

    So, I went back and examined the thermal images – no evidence of tampering was noted (nothing like the crude blackening of WTC 6). Indeed, there is minimal heat right after 7 was demolished and it still looks more like WTC 2 residue. But, very shortly after that, 3 large heat zones appear – linear, even spaced – 1 dead center and one on each side. It just took a while for the heat to transfer up. This would correlate with 3 surface to slightly sub-surface micro nukes in WTC 7. Set to explode just after/during the regular demolition would account for the more lateral flow of the pyroclastic flow.

    To date: 4 WTC buildings nuked using 10 micro neutron nukes total- most likely scenario.
    .
    WTCs 1 and 2 – 1 in the basement – shook people out of the building, 1 at ground level – last to go off, and 1 about the 60th floor give or take a few. 3 for each building.

    WTC 6 – Excellent evidence of what 1 micro neutron nuke can do. Only 8 stories high, but it also left a hole 45 feet deep – sub ground level detonation.

    WTC 7 – The heat signatures indicate 3 micro neutron nukes – sub ground level detonation.

    That makes a total of 10 focused micro neutron nukes needed to account for all the evidence.

    Ed Ward, MD – http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/ ; https://www.facebook.com/EdWardMD3 ;

    Judy Wood’s cold fusion scam – http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/01/16/dr-steven-jones-and-dr-judy-wood-lie-about-traces-of-tritium-and-neutron-nukes/

    Update: Proven 9-11 Nukes – http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/proven-9-11-nukes-us-government-involvement/

Comments are closed.